garmin or something else

Kelly wrote:
Thanks for all of the comments and suggestions.


To test I went up in a 496 equipped 172, a hood and another pilot and
simulated a panel is dead and in the soup. I used the 496 Panel page
and was able to get to 500 feet and the right end of the runway with
the shiny side up. I'm sold on the thing. It is critical though to
give the instrument time to average out. Especially airspeed. Don't
chase it.

I'm glad to hear that this worked out. I read a similar account in
Aviation Consumer, and it may have even been with a 396, In that
article, the point was made that the 396 (or 496) was a viable backup
in an emergency situation.

In considering the various options I have to get wx in flight, I
figure I will have to spend a minimum of $1200 or $1300, which at this
range would involve using my laptop along with a wxworx receiver, gps
receiver, and one of the less expensive flight planning/wx software
programs. When I consider this cost, it doesn't make the 396 at $1800
look so bad (or for that matter even the 496 at $2300).

One last thing -- has anyone used a smartphone communicating with a wx
receiver in flight? The approach systems software mentioned by one of
the posters has that option, as does Anywhere Map.

Kelly

Just for the record, while I never tried my experiment with a 396 I have
flown with one and there is a MASSIVE difference between the 1hz and 5hz
refreash rate. I doubt I could have flown the aircraft with just the 396
"panel" under the hood.