![]()  | 
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. | 
		
			
  | 	
	
	
		
		|||||||
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
		 
			 
			#9  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
Peter Dohm wrote: 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	"cavelamb himself" wrote in message ... Peter Dohm wrote: I was about to suggest thermoforming from either Lexan or Plexiglas, since I thought that was how the lenses on Bonanzas and the like were made. So, now you made me curious--how much surrounding airspace was available iside the ones you made? Peter Almost 1/2 inch above the 12 watt (1 amp) bulb. Remember that there are thermoforming plastics and thermoSETTING plastics. That might make all the difference in the world here... Richard I'll try to get another look. What I had seem may have had more clearance, or some source of ventilation; but I don't remember. Actually, I did have a car a while back with one of those rear window brake lights that eventually failed. For no obvious reason, the replacement bulb (of the same physical size and generic part number) quickly burned through the top of the plastic casing--despite having a peice of foil (which was original equipment) directly above the bulb. That was also in the 1amp range at 12-14 volts; but I believe that the clearance was closer to a quarter inch. A strobe should generate much less heat, especially localized heat, than an incandescent bulb; but this is a good problem to keep in mind for nav lights. Of course, LEDs have become an affordable and reliable alternative that also eliminate much of the heating problem--especially if the current source is remotely located. Peter Peter, I just happened to have the plug and one of the "experiments" on hand. Guess I need to revise the clearance question to LESS than 1/2 inch. This one, I believe, is polycarbinate (DUE TO THE LACK OF BUBBLES IN THE PLASTIC). The lexan attempts were made with .065 scrap from my windshield. Every one of those bubbled like crazy in the baking phase. Lexan is hydroscopic and retains considerable water. This stuff "boils" out while heating unless "baked" out at below 212 for several hours. It was kinda pretty with the colored light on inside it. But not exactly the sleek smooth aircraft parts I had in mind... Pic at: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~cavel...sc.htm#wingtip More clearance, thicker plastic, maybe they use some kind of special stuff - I really dunno there. Just that thin stuff with a fairly hot bulb simply didn't work... YMMV Richard  | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Pirep on replacing interior plastic parts | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | April 12th 05 06:06 AM | 
| Plastic Interior Parts? | Mike Spera | Owning | 16 | March 30th 05 09:35 PM | 
| Repairing Plastic Interior Parts of 40-year-old Aircraft | jls | Home Built | 6 | December 7th 04 11:04 PM | 
| 172 plastic interior parts | G.R. Patterson III | Owning | 9 | May 28th 04 11:28 PM | 
| Cessna 172 interior plastic parts | [email protected] | Piloting | 3 | February 11th 04 05:19 AM |