A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Safety Finish Scoring



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old September 12th 07, 04:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Steve Leonard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 51
Default Safety Finish Scoring

Karl Streideck worte:

'Extending the 20:1 minimum slope out another 5 miles
will not give any advantage because the scoring formula
uses a speed of 60mph from the safety fix home, while
most gliders would actually be doing 40%-80% faster
than this. There is also the time 'penalty' incurred
due to the requirement to climb higher than necessary,
so it's a double whammy. The pilot has to 'tank
up' but then doesn't get to convert the extra energy
to speed.'

Well, I thought it was 200 feet per statute mile, which
is 25:1, not 20:1. But anyway...

Since all this is GPS controlled, why are we giving
distance credit, at 60 MPH, to the finish point on
a safety finish? Why not end the flight (in miles
and time for scoring purposes), when the pilot turns
around inside the safety finish zone? Even progress
at 60 MPH boosts the speed a bit on a 45 MPH day, but
it slows you down if it had been a smoker. I think
if you are ending the flight for scoring purposes,
it should end there. Not continue on at some arbitraty
speed.

And I have never understood why we seem to think it
is safe to go down to about 1000 feet AGL, 5 miles
out with a storm on the field, get a finish, then try
and turn around so we can get away. Ever tried to
climb out from below 1000 feet near a storm, and not
in the inflow to it?

All this really just illustrates a point. Every rule
will have a corner on it. And if you go right to that
corner, you can put yourself in an unsafe position.
My favorite example of this is those that complain
that the Cylinder Finish is unsafe because it has a
corner 500 feet up, and one or two miles from the center
of the field, depending on finish point location.
Hitting that point at zero airspeed is not much different
than crossing a finish line, going the wrong direction
for landing, at 50 feet and 70 or 80 knots. Both are
'OK' by the rules, but both show very poor judgement.


As KS said, at some point, we all have to realize that
our lives are more important than a few points. Maybe
we should all be required to have a picture of our
wife and or family on the panel, looking us straight
in they eyes. Maybe that could cut back on some of
the corner cutting? I remember hearing Eric Mozer
say that he hit a thermal very low one day in his ASH-25
at Hobbs. He decided not to try and work it, as his
Dad was in the back seat. He said if he had been alone,
he probably would have tried to take it. They landed
out safely. Families are good. Do everything you
can to stay a part of yours.

My Nickels worth.

Steve Leonard
ZS




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Safety finish rule & circle radius Frank[_1_] Soaring 19 September 12th 07 07:31 PM
The Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) Safety Seminars Hit The Road in the USA [email protected] Soaring 0 September 11th 06 03:48 AM
OLC Scoring [email protected] Soaring 2 June 13th 06 03:01 AM
OLC scoring - USA Ian Cant Soaring 18 November 29th 05 07:43 PM
OLC scoring - USA Ian Cant Soaring 0 November 28th 05 03:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.