![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Karl Streideck worte:
'Extending the 20:1 minimum slope out another 5 miles will not give any advantage because the scoring formula uses a speed of 60mph from the safety fix home, while most gliders would actually be doing 40%-80% faster than this. There is also the time 'penalty' incurred due to the requirement to climb higher than necessary, so it's a double whammy. The pilot has to 'tank up' but then doesn't get to convert the extra energy to speed.' Well, I thought it was 200 feet per statute mile, which is 25:1, not 20:1. But anyway... Since all this is GPS controlled, why are we giving distance credit, at 60 MPH, to the finish point on a safety finish? Why not end the flight (in miles and time for scoring purposes), when the pilot turns around inside the safety finish zone? Even progress at 60 MPH boosts the speed a bit on a 45 MPH day, but it slows you down if it had been a smoker. I think if you are ending the flight for scoring purposes, it should end there. Not continue on at some arbitraty speed. And I have never understood why we seem to think it is safe to go down to about 1000 feet AGL, 5 miles out with a storm on the field, get a finish, then try and turn around so we can get away. Ever tried to climb out from below 1000 feet near a storm, and not in the inflow to it? All this really just illustrates a point. Every rule will have a corner on it. And if you go right to that corner, you can put yourself in an unsafe position. My favorite example of this is those that complain that the Cylinder Finish is unsafe because it has a corner 500 feet up, and one or two miles from the center of the field, depending on finish point location. Hitting that point at zero airspeed is not much different than crossing a finish line, going the wrong direction for landing, at 50 feet and 70 or 80 knots. Both are 'OK' by the rules, but both show very poor judgement. As KS said, at some point, we all have to realize that our lives are more important than a few points. Maybe we should all be required to have a picture of our wife and or family on the panel, looking us straight in they eyes. Maybe that could cut back on some of the corner cutting? I remember hearing Eric Mozer say that he hit a thermal very low one day in his ASH-25 at Hobbs. He decided not to try and work it, as his Dad was in the back seat. He said if he had been alone, he probably would have tried to take it. They landed out safely. Families are good. Do everything you can to stay a part of yours. My Nickels worth. Steve Leonard ZS |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Safety finish rule & circle radius | Frank[_1_] | Soaring | 19 | September 12th 07 07:31 PM |
The Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) Safety Seminars Hit The Road in the USA | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | September 11th 06 03:48 AM |
OLC Scoring | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | June 13th 06 03:01 AM |
OLC scoring - USA | Ian Cant | Soaring | 18 | November 29th 05 07:43 PM |
OLC scoring - USA | Ian Cant | Soaring | 0 | November 28th 05 03:09 AM |