A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Over time, Mogas deteriorates faster than Avgas"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old September 16th 07, 03:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,573
Default "Over time, Mogas deteriorates faster than Avgas"

If you leave it in your airplane, it isn't stored in a tightly closed
container, though, is it? It sure isn't in mine!


Um, well, it's as tightly closed as any vented tank can be. Even gas
station storage tanks aren't sealed tight, or they'd be unable to
expand/contract with temperature changes.

I have noticed the difference and found that mogas, having sat in an
airplane for a few months, is a lot harder to get going than equivelant
Avgas in the same airpane.


I have never noticed the slightest difference. Now, of course, I
don't let my plane sit for months, or even weeks -- but my motorcycle,
convertible, lawn mower(s), lawn blower(s) and vacuum, and snow
blower(s) ALL sit for many months, unused. No problemo starting or
running in the spring/winter.

Also, we have a shell petro-chemical engineer in our circle and he tells
us that the aromatics in mogas evaporate more readily thuus causing the
degradation in quality.


Again, a cite? ANYTHING in writing, ANYWHERE about this problem with
mogas?

For ten years I've been hearing "my buddy the engineer told his
brother that..." -- and, after a decade (and over 9,000 gallons of
trouble-free mogas in our planes) I'm simply not buying it anymore
without SOME kind of evidence.

IMHO, as with so many of these things, we desperately want to believe
that gasoline that costs 25% more is really better in some tangible
way. I have seen no evidence of this, at all, over a decade of use.
That would zero, zilch, nada -- no difference.

Of course, to that end, there are STILL people out there who will pay
a premium for high-octane gasoline for their cars, despite
overwhelming evidence that this is a complete waste of money. The
oil companies just shrug their shoulders, pocket the extra dough, and
keep making commercials touting how their brand "cleans your
injectors", or some other BS.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sunday 072907 in Oshkosh Pt 1 - the C17 [5/6] - "19 C17 more drama, this time from the sun just above the picture.jpg" yEnc (1/1) Just Plane Noise[_2_] Aviation Photos 0 July 30th 07 11:49 PM
$5.64 for a gallon of "Chateau de AvGas" Jay Honeck Piloting 22 July 4th 07 05:33 PM
FS: 2002 "Ghosts: A Time Remembered" (Aviation) Calendar J.R. Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 1 December 20th 05 08:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.