![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:00:32 +0000 (UTC)
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: WhoGivesAFig? wrote in news ![]() @newsfe06.lga: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: WhoGivesAFig? wrote in : C J Campbell wrote: On 2007-09-18 07:06:06 -0700, WhoGivesAFig? said: This could be huge http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABP...2003889769.pdf Hmmm. A retired employee who worked for Boeing for 46 years claims to know more than the FAA and Boeing about how planes should be crash tested. He concludes that composites are not as crashworthy as metal, but does not back his assertions up with any hard data. His complaint is that composite materials are stronger in some directions than they are in others, that cracking is less visible, and that composites are more subject to fire and more vulnerable to lightning. He points out that g levels in a crash are unlikely to be uniform all along a composite structure. All of this is true, but he seems to be alleging some sort of Boeing coverup of these facts. He discounts actual experience with other composite aircraft, saying that either they are not airliners subjected to the stress and number of flights that airliners get, or that the numbers of such composite aircraft are too few to be statistically significant. Of course, his report will make great fodder for trial lawyers when the first 787 crashes, no matter what the actual cause of death of the passengers is. Weldon seems to be down at the site trying to tell people how to crash test an airplane even though he no longer works there. No doubt his experience is valuable, but he cannot possibly be aware of everything that Boeing is doing to mitigate these problems and Boeing is certainly not going to give corporate secrets to former employees. He claims to know more than Boeing he may or may not. 46 years is a lot of experience. Does he know more than the FAA? My dog knows more than the FAA about aviation. I think I just found a new pet. Bertie You can have him. He is a fat worthless mutt. Just like a Government employee I meant you fjukkwit! Fetch! Bertie Every Tom Dick and Hairy *knows* that carpon fibre is *much* more g-resistant than 4041 aluminium tubes. Sheesh. -- http://isolatr.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Military parts were flawed, indictment says | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 3rd 04 08:58 PM |
Florida List for Purge of Voters Proves Flawed | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 2 | July 10th 04 05:57 PM |