A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

787 flawed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15  
Old September 19th 07, 03:45 PM posted to alt.disasters.aviation,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,rec.aviation.piloting
§ñühw¤£f[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default 787 flawed

On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:00:32 +0000 (UTC)
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

WhoGivesAFig? wrote in newsWVHi.40$Wv3.34
@newsfe06.lga:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
WhoGivesAFig? wrote in
:

C J Campbell wrote:
On 2007-09-18 07:06:06 -0700, WhoGivesAFig?
said:

This could be huge

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABP...2003889769.pdf
Hmmm. A retired employee who worked for Boeing for 46 years claims

to
know more than the FAA and Boeing about how planes should be crash
tested. He concludes that composites are not as crashworthy as

metal,
but does not back his assertions up with any hard data.

His complaint is that composite materials are stronger in some
directions than they are in others, that cracking is less visible,
and that composites are more subject to fire and more vulnerable to
lightning. He points out that g levels in a crash are unlikely to

be
uniform all along a composite structure. All of this is true, but

he
seems to be alleging some sort of Boeing coverup of these facts. He
discounts actual experience with other composite aircraft, saying
that either they are not airliners subjected to the stress and

number
of flights that airliners get, or that the numbers of such

composite
aircraft are too few to be statistically significant.

Of course, his report will make great fodder for trial lawyers when
the first 787 crashes, no matter what the actual cause of death of
the passengers is. Weldon seems to be down at the site trying to

tell
people how to crash test an airplane even though he no longer works
there. No doubt his experience is valuable, but he cannot possibly

be
aware of everything that Boeing is doing to mitigate these problems
and Boeing is certainly not going to give corporate secrets to

former
employees.

He claims to know more than Boeing he may or may not. 46
years is a lot of experience. Does he know more than the
FAA? My dog knows more than the FAA about aviation.


I think I just found a new pet.


Bertie


You can have him. He is a fat worthless
mutt. Just like a Government employee



I meant you fjukkwit!

Fetch!


Bertie


Every Tom Dick and Hairy *knows* that carpon fibre is *much* more g-resistant than 4041 aluminium tubes.

Sheesh.

--
http://isolatr.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Military parts were flawed, indictment says Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 3rd 04 08:58 PM
Florida List for Purge of Voters Proves Flawed WalterM140 Military Aviation 2 July 10th 04 05:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.