![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-10-11 15:57:17 -0700, daffy said:
Quite a good article in the Nov/Dec AARP magazine titled "Listening for Quiet". It talks about a silent sanctuary in Washington's Olympic National park. The article concluded by someone complaining about the silence broken by a small plane. The article said "The small plane flying north more than doubles the ambient sound, and we react to the intruder as a threat, drawing in, tracking the source, hunching for cover until the last traces of engine noise finally die away." The Olympic National Park covers much of northwestern Washington, including a great deal of the coast, all of the Olympic Mountains, the Hoh Rain Forest, and much else. It is bordered by important airports that serve coastal towns, Indian reservations, and international travel. There are several airports within the boundaries of the park. There are also several military training areas in and around the park. There is a narrow corridor between the park and Sub Base Bangor which is one of the major routes for traffic flying Canada, the San Juan Islands, Bremerton, Tacoma, Olympia, and Seattle. Most aircraft avoid flying over the Olympic Mountains because it is relatively dangerous, rugged territory prone to unpredictable weather and icing. Because of the park's location, however, and the fact that the park is broken into two sections, it is not always possible to fly a route around the park. It can mean adding several hours to a flight to go around. Not only that, but bad weather in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, on the coast, or on Puget Sound can leave you little choice. Pilots do try to maintain at least 2000' above wild areas as requested by the National Park Service. However, planes taking off or landing obviously are going to have to fly lower than 2000.' There are additional aircraft that fly lower than 2000' for scientific and law enforcement purposes, as well as search and rescue, fire fighting, and surveying. Specially equipped airplanes regularly fly at low level over the park as part of the effort to control our borders, fight smuggling, and look for terrorist activity. Some areas completely bounded by the park are managed lands set aside for tree farming. There are aircraft actively involved in logging there. Boeing and some airlines have been known to conduct training flights at low altitude over the park. Aviation is a huge and necessary part of the activity at Olympic National Park, perhaps more so than any other park in the nation. Many peoples' lives and much of the health of the park itself are dependent on it. If you want to get away from airplanes and their noise, Olympic National Park is a poor choice. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anybody else listening to Pilotcast? | Paul Tomblin | General Aviation | 3 | May 14th 07 08:24 PM |
Is listening to ATC useful? | 601XL Builder | Piloting | 2 | October 16th 06 02:06 AM |
Is listening to ATC useful? | Dan Luke | Piloting | 0 | October 15th 06 04:42 PM |
Is listening to ATC useful? | tjd | Piloting | 0 | October 15th 06 05:13 AM |
Listening to ATC at Oshkosh | Chief McGee | Home Built | 2 | July 24th 05 09:04 PM |