![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill,
At Lasham we still use vehicle retrieves and a 2 drum main winch set up on days or evenings when demand for winch launches is low, say when we are operating 5 gliders or less. Also the last launch of the day is always done without the retrieve winch connected so that we can wind the cable fully into the main winch. Although I don't have a large data set, comparisions between the last two launches of the day suggest that we lose about 80 feet off a typical 1600 ft launch due to the retrieve winch, which is 5%. This is using steel cables on both winches. We have used an all synthetic cable set up in the past when the losses were almost negligible. Only problem was that the small diameter synthetic cable on the retrieve winch wore out within 6 weeks due to ground abrasion! I can't see that there should be any realistic limits on the length of retrieve cable, as long as you can keep it light - see UHMWPE cable below. However sideways drift in a crosswind needs to be a consideration. You may need a very wide as well as a very long airfield. The retrieve cables we use are about half the diameter of the main cables, so only weigh a quarter of the amount for a given length. The back pull may initiate a slightly earlier back release, Our retrieve winch is fitted with a 1.9 litre industrial VW engine developing about 90 hp, and even that labours a bit during the retrieve (even with synthetic cables) so the starter motor idea, if you will excuse the pun, is a non-starter! UHMWPE cable, such as Spectra, Plasma or Dyneema (trade names) is pretty amazing stuff. It looks like washing line, but is stronger than steel whilst being 10 times lighter. Unfortunately it is also about five times more expensive than the equivalent steel cable and requires modifications to the winch. For the lengths of winch run we use, normally about 4200ft, it wasn't found to give that much improvement in height, less than 100ft, and was deemed by our Committee not to be cost effective. It would certainly come into its own on 5000 feet or longer runs, when steel cable starts to become significantly heavy. Del Copeland At 23:12 28 November 2007, Bill Daniels wrote: It could be you're right but I'd still like to see an actual comparison with and without the retrieve winch at longer and longer distances. Some validated metrics would help sell the idea. It has yet to be determined just how long ropes can be with a retrieve winch. What I'm worried about isn't the weight of Dyneema/Spectra ropes it's the pull angle at the hook. If the retrieve rope drags back enough to change that angle it will adversely affect the height achieved. I know an engineer who was working on a simple 'spinner reel' type design for a retrieve winch that would use 1 or 1.5mm Dyneema. Calculations showed that the power required is minimal - you could power it with a small car starter motor and a battery. 2000 meters of thin Dyneema would fit on a drum not much bigger than a coffee can. With the 'spinner reel' concept Dyneema would pay off the retrieve winch with no rotation of the tiny drum. On the bright side, using a retrieve winch would cut the fuel use by half. Bill Daniels 'tommytoyz' wrote in message . com... Back in Germany we used two twin drum Tost winches on our field and launched all day long back to back, as long as there were planes needing to be launched. Wires were retrieved with a retrieve vehicle, two at a time. I think the British method of using a single drum winch in combination with a retrieve winch to be a very sensible idea - even for long fields and high launches. The cable is being retrieved before it even hits the ground. So the retrieve process is shorter and faster than using a retrieve vehicle by dragging the entire cable length along the ground. The winch retrieve should there for also save on wear and tear on the cable as most of th retrieve occurs in the air after the glider releases. On very high tows, a long portion of the cable is never wound up into the tow drum and there for a high altitude launch should actually reduce the cable retrieve process using a cable retrieve winch. The light weight of the newer cables makes a launch penalty negligible. The retrieve cable need not be very strong or even in good shape anyway, as it's only function is to retrieve the cable. I like this approach and seems the cheapest way to introduce high frequency winch operations in the USA. I wish Commercial Glider Operators would buy a single drum winch and a retrieve winch and offer this launch method. Even at 10-15 a launch - it's still heaps cheaper and the operator would probably make more money at the end of the day. Not to speak about the fact that winch launches a far and away more fun and exiting than aero tows. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to get maximum height on a winch launch? | Dan G | Soaring | 38 | December 22nd 16 12:29 AM |
Winch launch speed versus height gain | Neil | Soaring | 20 | November 9th 07 12:57 AM |
Record Highs/Record Lows | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 12 | October 12th 06 01:27 AM |
Perlan height record in Argentina | Charles Yeates | Soaring | 3 | September 1st 06 12:59 PM |
LIppmann reports a 950 meter winch launch with their Dynatec winch line - anything higher? | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 20 | December 27th 04 12:33 AM |