![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "kirk.stant" wrote in message ... On Dec 8, 4:29 am, John Galloway wrote: Having some time in airplanes that used AOA (gauge, lights, and variable audio cues) in preference to airspeed during low speed flight (F-4s, in my case) I can vouch that it's a much better way to fly - especially when the AOA is coupled with an audio signal. But in a glider, I thing the working AOA range that we are interested in is a lot smaller than the AOA range that low aspect ratio jets use, so in practice it may be more difficult to implement. Actually, I think the opposite is more likely. Gliders operate from near stall to high speed running. Due to the far lower wing and span loading in gliders, the minimum AOA may be less than a jet. I'd bet that the AOA range of a glider is greater. There are a lot of ways to display AOA data and each pilot may have a different preference. A vertical column of different colored bright LED's that could be 'read' (i.e. thermal with the green LED lit.) with peripheral vision might work. An old Pratt-Read that I used to fly had two very pleasant windsong tones that changed pitch right at the best thermalling AOA. Of course, that was before audio varios. Maybe a better idea is to the replace the vario audio with bright LED lightbar display and replicate the old PR's windsong for AOA. The LED part should be easy since most electronic varios have a + or - 5V output for a rear seat repeater. BTW, 'pitch strings' are sensitive to yaw because they have to be mounted on the outside of the transparent part of the canopy which puts them way above the 'beltline' of the fuselage. Mounting them lower and further forward would make them less sensitive to yaw but of course, you wouldn't be able to see them. To find the best place for a AOA vane, you could put a bunch of yarns on the fuselage side and a video camera on the wing aimed at them. A flight test at various AOA and yaw angles would show the location least sensitive to yaw. Still, I think Wayne is on the right track with pressure ports on the top and bottom of the nose. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stalls - Angle of Attack versus Vstall | [email protected] | Piloting | 44 | October 6th 06 01:26 AM |
preferrred bank angle indicator? | Matt Herron Jr. | Soaring | 34 | July 10th 06 02:22 PM |
Need glider airspeed indicator | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | June 21st 05 09:57 PM |
Glider vs. Power Pattern Bank Angle? | Jim Vincent | Soaring | 28 | June 15th 04 03:41 PM |
Lift and Angle of Attack | Peter Duniho | Simulators | 9 | October 2nd 03 10:55 PM |