![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
I thought the original question was about inverted "V" engines. While the LOM and Mikron engines are excellent products, they are inverted I-6 and I-4 engines, not a "V". Bootstrap a couple of them together! ;-) Didn't we discuss an old US tank engine in here? It was 5 or more engines geared together. Lots of unique engines in tanks, air cooled gas radials, 90 degree "V" diesels, etc... BTW, neither the LOM or the Ranger engines suffer from 'hydraulic lock' which seems to be mostly related to P&W radials. I owned a Ranger inverted in-line 6 which powered a PT - 19 and it never even smoked on start. I also flew a Zlin with a LOM I-6 and it didn't give problems. I think the inverted engines allow a nicer looking cowl and they do improve the pilots visibility forward and down. Yep... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
R172K Approach Configuration | facpi | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | January 5th 07 03:58 PM |
V-22 Prop Configuration, 3-vs-4 blades | Don McIntyre | Naval Aviation | 23 | April 10th 06 03:23 AM |
T-2C Buckeye nav light configuration. | Mike W. | Naval Aviation | 14 | March 17th 05 07:05 AM |
Question about center-line push-pull engine configuration | Shin Gou | Home Built | 4 | June 7th 04 05:57 PM |
Hyping the Intermeshing Configuration | Dave Jackson | Rotorcraft | 0 | October 31st 03 08:34 PM |