![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Daniels wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... Bill Daniels wrote: "Morgans" wrote in message ... "GeorgeB" wrote I'd bet that if an auto engine would out perform Lycontental, we'd see them certified and in use; the only water cooled engine I know of in certified applications is the water cooled HEAD engine by Rotax. They get 80 HP @ 5500 rpm from 74 cu-in ... and a 1500 hr TBO. They are not cheap to build, either; even the uncertified ones are in the $15,000 range. Business wants to make money; if you can build a 230 HP engine that will reliably give 2000 hours in an airplane and sell it for $10,000, I'd bet that getting it certified and insured will be a piece of cake ... certified, it is probalby over a $30,000 sale. But my own opinion ... if it were that easy, it would have been done. It has been, by many people. Many V-8's and V-6's are well past 2,000 hours, with no rebuilding necessary. Orenda did it, and certified it, but designed their own V-8, but it is not much different than GM V-8's. It might be time to trot out the blog on how GM torture tests it's engines, before a design goes into production. I don't have the file handy, but perhaps someone else does. Without the file handy, it is an easy jump to say that their duty cycles and punishment make a certification test run look like child's play. The problem with auto engine conversions is seldom the engine. It is usually in the accessories, or the prop speed reducers. There are good products out there for those, too. One has to only put them together. -- Jim in NC FWIW, My Chrysler 318 Cu In V8 just turned 8600 hours without any service other than oil changes and spark plugs. Of course, that's in a Jeep Grand Cherokee. As I understand it, the 318 is neither better or worse than other V8's. Wow, you have an hour meter in your Jeep. I never saw that on the options list! Matt It's in the vehicle computer but you have to have a scanner to see it. You'd be amazed at the information those black boxes keep on you. Yes, I've heard they track quite a range of variables. Are those hours that the engine was actually running or hours that the computer was operating? Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Engine configuration | Michael Henry | Home Built | 42 | December 20th 07 10:30 PM |
Engine configuration | cavedweller | Home Built | 7 | December 16th 07 01:23 AM |
V-22 Prop Configuration, 3-vs-4 blades | Don McIntyre | Naval Aviation | 23 | April 10th 06 03:23 AM |
T-2C Buckeye nav light configuration. | Mike W. | Naval Aviation | 14 | March 17th 05 07:05 AM |
Question about center-line push-pull engine configuration | Shin Gou | Home Built | 4 | June 7th 04 05:57 PM |