A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Engine configuration



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
Old December 24th 07, 02:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default Engine configuration

Bill Daniels wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
Bill Daniels wrote:
"Morgans" wrote in message
...
"GeorgeB" wrote

I'd bet that if an auto engine would out perform Lycontental, we'd see
them certified and in use; the only water cooled engine I know of in
certified applications is the water cooled HEAD engine by Rotax. They
get 80 HP @ 5500 rpm from 74 cu-in ... and a 1500 hr TBO. They are
not cheap to build, either; even the uncertified ones are in the
$15,000 range.

Business wants to make money; if you can build a 230 HP engine that
will reliably give 2000 hours in an airplane and sell it for $10,000,
I'd bet that getting it certified and insured will be a piece of cake
... certified, it is probalby over a $30,000 sale.

But my own opinion ... if it were that easy, it would have been done.
It has been, by many people. Many V-8's and V-6's are well past 2,000
hours, with no rebuilding necessary.

Orenda did it, and certified it, but designed their own V-8, but it is
not much different than GM V-8's.

It might be time to trot out the blog on how GM torture tests it's
engines, before a design goes into
production. I don't have the file handy, but perhaps someone else does.

Without the file handy, it is an easy jump to say that their duty cycles
and punishment make a certification test run look like child's play.

The problem with auto engine conversions is seldom the engine. It is
usually in the accessories, or the prop speed reducers. There are good
products out there for those, too. One has to only put them together.
--
Jim in NC

FWIW, My Chrysler 318 Cu In V8 just turned 8600 hours without any service
other than oil changes and spark plugs. Of course, that's in a Jeep
Grand Cherokee. As I understand it, the 318 is neither better or worse
than other V8's.

Wow, you have an hour meter in your Jeep. I never saw that on the options
list!

Matt


It's in the vehicle computer but you have to have a scanner to see it.
You'd be amazed at the information those black boxes keep on you.


Yes, I've heard they track quite a range of variables. Are those hours
that the engine was actually running or hours that the computer was
operating?

Matt
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Engine configuration Michael Henry Home Built 42 December 20th 07 10:30 PM
Engine configuration cavedweller Home Built 7 December 16th 07 01:23 AM
V-22 Prop Configuration, 3-vs-4 blades Don McIntyre Naval Aviation 23 April 10th 06 03:23 AM
T-2C Buckeye nav light configuration. Mike W. Naval Aviation 14 March 17th 05 07:05 AM
Question about center-line push-pull engine configuration Shin Gou Home Built 4 June 7th 04 05:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.