![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Air density is criticial to aircraft performance, which is why it
surprises me that both Piper and Cessna Landing performance charts show the climbout weight limit as a function of pressure height and not density height. As I understand it ( at least from Australian Regs) the aircraft needs to have a minimum climb gradient of 3.2% in the event of a go around being required. Surely the achievable climb out gradient must be density ht dependant. I dont think I have a problem with the the understanding of what pressure and density hts are and how to determine them, but I cant reconcile my understanding of what they are with the performance chart. .Am I missing something here? Terry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sporty's E6B density altitude disparity | Dallas | Piloting | 30 | May 1st 07 10:31 PM |
check brake pressure in pre-landing checklist? | Ray | Piloting | 24 | October 7th 05 04:35 AM |
Ebay Auction Jeppesen VHS (4) tapes collection: Enroute Charts, IFR Emergencies, Departures & Arrivals, Approach Charts | Cecil Chapman | Products | 0 | February 9th 05 03:09 AM |
Pressure Altitude or Density Altitude | john smith | Piloting | 3 | July 22nd 04 10:48 AM |
F-4E Landing and takoff charts? | Boomer | Military Aviation | 0 | June 29th 04 07:03 AM |