![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "WolfRat" wrote They could aero-brake from orbit slower but it would take forever. Not really. If you slow down gradually, the effect of gravity takes hold, and you start falling faster. Mush of the speed is picked back up in that manner. If they launched an unmanned fuel source, docked and then transfered fuel it could be done. You still have to pay to get all of that fuel up there. That is not cheap, let alone the fueling station cost, and the weight to get that up there. Keep it simple the new Orion(Apollo on steroids) will work just fine. The Russians have done a good job with safe and repeated journeys from orbit. I would have more of a warm fuzzy feeling, if that were true. The Russians have lost a couple crews on the whole re-entry landing procedure, I believe. At least one, I am positive. The Orion will be/should be more reliable, because of more simplicity, and the fact that it will be above the whole rocket, and the fact that it does not need to be made reusable. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Shuttle Frequencies (in UK) ?? | Andrew | General Aviation | 4 | September 12th 06 09:26 PM |
Space Shuttle Chaos Continues | Whatdoyouexpect | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | March 15th 06 12:45 PM |
Boeing 747 Space Shuttle Transporter | Jim | Piloting | 6 | August 22nd 05 12:40 AM |