A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Zzzz Campbell's Second Lawsuit Against Sun-N-Fun Zzzz



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old October 3rd 03, 03:30 AM
ChuckSlusarczyk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Ron Wanttaja says...
Well, the local courts haven't been any friendlier to him. Campbell or his
business entities (US AVIATOR, Airedale, Aero-Media, ANN, etc.) have been
involved in at least 27 lawsuits. Of the 27 I found records of, he's never
won a suit he's filed, and, of those filed against him, he's lost seven and
had the judge rule in his favor only once.


27!!! that's more then I thought he had and he has the nerve to berate me
because I threatened to sue G Conn LOL!!!


Campbell was the plaintiff in ten. He outright lost two, SnF #1 and the
Pulsar case. Of the remainder, three were apparently settled out-of-court,



"settled out of court" I guess by jaun the toadies reasoning zoom has
"successfully sued" 3 times which by the same jaun logic means... he lost....

Campbell's record as defendant is worse. Of the 17, he lost seven outright
("Lost" as in the judge ruling that he owed the plaintiff money). One even
included a garnishment action against Campbell. Two were settled
out-of-court (in one, the Airedale bankruptcy, Campbell agreed to pay
$50,000). Others were dropped for various reasons.


Hmmm wonder what "logic" jaun would produce for those :-) zoom didn't lose
....Chuck lied. LOL!!! would seem jauns hero has feet of clay and is sue happy.
All this and zoom has the nerve to try and judge other people what a phoney . I
hope his advertizers start reading RAH so they can see the kind of person they
are enabling with their ad money. Wonder how they'll feel going to SnF knowing
the guy they are supporting with their ad money is sueing SnF.I for one won't
support any of his advertizers and I will tell them why if they ask.



His one victory was when a suit by an apparent vendor was dismissed with
prejudice: STAR PRESS & SPALDING PUBLISHERS vs. CAMPBELL, JAMES
KINDRED SPIRIT PRESS, Polk County case 2000SC-002167-0000-00.


That's the one he'll toot all over the place .

Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

"evil didn't prosper because good men spoke and evil is still nuts" anon

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.