A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why so expensive (flight recorders)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old February 16th 08, 09:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
PCool
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 99
Default Why so expensive (flight recorders)

I fly in Italy, and Garmin COTS are accepted for badges up to gold,
excluding the heigth (1000 and 3000 m).
For diamonds and 1000m, 3000m, 5000m you need an approved IGC logger.

Once you understand that COTS can be manipulated anytime without even
bothering touching the hardware, you also understand that an IGC approved
recorder cannot even be tampered and leaves no doubts about the flight.

If we consider a COTS like a camera, then it all comes down to the
observation of a judge/supervisor just like with cameras in the good old
times. Fact is, that there are too many COTS and unless there are some
restrictions on models we cannot expect that a man is able to know and
understand each of them. So there has to be a "white list" and a "black
list".

I fly with Garmin 76S and 76CSX. Like all Garmin models they cannot be
hacked. There's no way one can change the firmware, otherwise one could also
load pirated maps and everybody know that with Garmin it's impossible on
COTS unless you have an unlock code. The newer Colorado 400T has glide
calculations as well and seems to be the only valid alternatives to palms at
least for basic data and good maps.

However, with garmins you can save a flight and then load it back as the
current track. Or you can load a track and then put it on as the current
track. Not that this means anything, cause the track should be coherent to
the flight times which you cannot predict.

Personally I think that COTS are ok for most of the times, even in
competitions if a competent supervisor is on the field.

Paul


"nimbusgb" ha scritto nel messaggio
...

So, before we go off into fantasy land, let's start talking about the
REALISTIC threats and the differences between the two approaches.
IGC Approved loggers clearly have the advantage in that they offer an
easier administrative approach at contests and other gatherings where
there isn't direct supervision of the FRs. COTS loggers will
require additional manual intervention which make them less attractive
for those situations, but they are equally desirable for a supervised
Silver C.

Off to go skiing. At least I'll be on the ridge...

P3


So we agree then!



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Standalone Flight Recorders for Club Use ContestID67 Soaring 8 April 24th 07 01:27 AM
Amendment 9 to the Technical Specification for IGC Flight Recorders Ian Strachan Soaring 0 July 1st 06 06:50 PM
IGC-approval levels for some types of Flight Recorders Ian Strachan Soaring 42 March 19th 05 05:42 PM
Commercial - Mounts for GPS Flight Recorders Paul Remde Soaring 0 March 13th 04 02:03 PM
Approved IGC Flight recorders mat Redsell Soaring 2 March 5th 04 03:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.