![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 23, 5:52*pm, Papa3 wrote:
On Feb 23, 1:08*pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: Simularly, fusing pressure data with GPS altitude data could work the same way. *For example, a millisecond scale spike in GPS altitude, not confirmed by presure data could be ignored with impunity. *A slow drift of the pressure signal from the smoothed GPS signal is almost certainly a synoptic pressure change and can be canceled by the long term stability of the GPS signal making the pressure signal more useful in detecting airspace incursions. *(Think automatic Kollsman settings.) Bill Daniels Which, interestingly, is exactly what the $200 Garmins with Pressure Sensor do! P3 So, in effect, IGC/GFAC are holding back progress on better altitude measurement--at lower cost--by refusing to allow [certain] COTS receivers? ![]() should be welcomed, not feared! Chip Bearden ASW 24 "JB" USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Standalone Flight Recorders for Club Use | ContestID67 | Soaring | 8 | April 24th 07 01:27 AM |
Amendment 9 to the Technical Specification for IGC Flight Recorders | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 0 | July 1st 06 06:50 PM |
IGC-approval levels for some types of Flight Recorders | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 42 | March 19th 05 05:42 PM |
Commercial - Mounts for GPS Flight Recorders | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | March 13th 04 02:03 PM |
Approved IGC Flight recorders | mat Redsell | Soaring | 2 | March 5th 04 03:35 PM |