![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Logajan wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote: I would respectfully disagree with this analysis based on hundreds of hours spent working with both primary students, flight instructors, and Microsoft. Sims have their use, but if used before solo can actually be detrimental for various reasons, some of them absolutely critical to student progress. After solo, and when used with the proper supervision, the sims have their productive side as well. Hmmm. That seems to be a stronger statement about pre-solo use than I've seen you state in the recent past. Or maybe I'm over-extending "pre-solo" to include "pre-flight-training" that you didn't intend? That is, if time is split thusly: Big Bang - birth - simming - initial flight training - solo - PPL - death - Big Crunch Then that order is okay so long as simming and pre-solo flight training don't overlap? Or you believe simming is _only_ a net positive use after solo and even then only under supervision? Hmmm. Otherwise your advice appears to be at odds with what Bruce Williams wrote in his book "Microsoft Flight Simulator as a Training Aid." That is, while he too says pre-solo simming _can_ be detrimental, it appears he believes that is not an immutable issue and lays out some guidelines that he believes can make pre-flight training use a net positive. But I guess that is not surprising, given that he wrote a book on the subject! (There seem to be anecdotes posted by people who have felt use of MS Flight Simulator helped them get a leg-up in their training and others who felt MS FS actually slowed them down.) You are mistaken in your analysis. My opinions on this issue are quite well known and what I have said here is in no way conflictive with any earlier opinion. I did however OMIT part of that opinion by not including that I see no objection at all to the sim being used BEFORE dual commences as well as after solo, so the actual envelope I have always stressed constitutes ommission of the simulator between the first hour of dual instruction and solo. After solo, the sim can again be used and has specific advantages. There is no doubt at all in my mind that people coming into dual instruction after being exposed to the simulator have an advantage, but considering this, I still stress leaving the sim alone between first dual and solo for the exact reasons I've given. You mentioned Bruce Williams book on the sim as a training tool. I believe Mr. Williams and I are in a fair amount of agreement on how the sim can be used by flight instructors as a training aid. In fact, Bruce sent me the book to review. I did that for ASA and you will find a link to my review on Bruce Williams web site. If you wish, you may shortcut directly to that review by going to www.simflight.com and searching my name. You will find it there. -- Dudley Henriques |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bearing and Course, differences? | Allen Smith | Piloting | 27 | September 2nd 07 03:28 PM |
Rep vs. Dem Differences | Jim Weir | Piloting | 212 | September 8th 04 04:02 PM |
Aluminum differences | Lou Parker | Home Built | 16 | August 25th 04 06:48 PM |
ASW 20, ASW 20B, ASW 20C DIFFERENCES | Ventus B | Soaring | 8 | July 18th 04 10:28 AM |
Differences between Garmin 295 and 196? | carlos | Products | 1 | March 6th 04 06:12 AM |