![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
buttman wrote:
On Mar 4, 5:30 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote: Don't flatter yourself. I could care less if you are a CFI or not other than establishing that if you are, you're certainly not worth the title. If you have the rating, as I seem to see below, this simply verifies that the system allowed you through. You're the one who has been harping on me for the past few months trying to get me to "prove" I'm really a CFI. I finally do and you blow it off. Thats basically what I expected. Your posts attesting to how you handle the rating are more than enough for my use. How you profess to be teaching your students is much more revealing than whether or not you actually are a CFI. Be advised that I intend using your online personna of "Buttman" and some of your posting as a negative example other CFI's on how NOT to instruct. You realize I've posted maybe 15 times in my entire 3 year Usenet career on the subject of flight instructing? I'd LOOOVE to hear your case against me. So you're with a CFI applicant. Today is the day where you give him the "how not to be a CFI" talk. You go over to your computer, load up Usenet, and begin to show this person all the horrors internet user Buttman has brought upon the profession. I really don't even care about specifics, but I'd really like to know what kind of things you'd say. Based on your posting here, you'd probably just make some blanket claims "this guy is a horrible instructor", the try to justify it solely by the virtue of the fact you have some achievements, rather than any kind of logic or reasoning, "This is true because I've been in the industry for 200 years and I've worked with blah blah blah". I've not read a single thing you've posted here where you've made ANY attempt to justify your points other than with your signature file. I'm sure this means little to you From my email however,it apparently means something to others who frequent this forum. Don't flatter yourself. I have nothing against you personally. I don't even know you. You don't use your actual name and the stage personna you've chosen souns like it came from a 2 year old. I just think your approach to flight instruction can use some "amplification" so to speak. A lot of us spend a great deal of time on these groups trying to help people learn to fly PROPERLY. Every now and then someone like yourself comes along and starts posting here in some "authorative manner". I simply want every student here to know that for whatever they want to take out of it either way, I for one don't care for the things you have to say concerning flying and flight instruction and in fact believe that some of what you profess to do with students is in my opinion anyway, downright dangerous. That's all there is to it my friend. Just a vast difference in opinion between you and me as to how flight instruction should be performed. How people on the forum take this is strictly up to each individual who reads what each of us has to say. Nothing personal at all. I just wouldn't fly with you that's all. -- Dudley Henriques |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
flaps again | Kobra | Piloting | 107 | January 5th 08 04:31 PM |
flaps again | Kobra | Owning | 84 | January 5th 08 04:32 AM |
flaps | Kobra[_4_] | Owning | 85 | July 16th 07 06:16 PM |
Flaps on take-off and landing | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 397 | September 22nd 06 09:02 AM |
FLAPS | skysailor | Soaring | 36 | September 7th 05 05:28 AM |