![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JGalban via AviationKB.com wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder wrote: The big draw back is the F-117 should have been called the A-117 as it really isn't a fighter. It has no ability to defend itself except to hide which it does very well. Remember it is a night only weapon which does limit it's usefulness somewhat. I always wondered what the AF was thinking when they came up with the F-117 designation. There's absolutely nothing "fighter" about it. Even older attack jets like the A-7 had some ability to engage other aircraft. Years ago at Holloman I asked an F-117 pilot about the fighter designation. His reply was that he didn't know either. He said, "Everyone knows that this thing couldn't fight its way out of a paper bag". John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) Actually, the F-117 can carry two 2K warheads. And, with the LGB weapons, it was deadly. This may not be fighter, but at the time with the stealth technology and being able to fly at night to attack targets, it was unstoppable. Just remember the first Gulf War in 1990. -- Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP KSWI |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Retired | Greasy Rider[_3_] | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 16th 07 07:33 PM |
Where are the (retired) carriers? | DDAY | Naval Aviation | 20 | November 9th 06 02:23 PM |
Retired African Pilots | kestrel254 | Piloting | 2 | July 15th 06 10:58 PM |
Retired Officer of NCO - Looking for | Larry | Military Aviation | 0 | April 9th 04 06:02 PM |