![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just got a "service Letter in the mail from Parker. Dated Feb 15,
2008 It states that "All Parker/Airborne engine driven air pumps are beyond their mandatory replacement time and must be removed from services" Bascally they are saying that if you have a Parker/Airborne Vac Pump that its toast, remove it before the next flight. Now I dont, mine is a Garwin wet unit, but this seems like this is either a blanket get out of jail liability card or one hell of a way to make some money. The letter goes on to say that they realize that owners have a choice of using a new or overhauled unit but "owners/pilots must be aware of the increased risk of pneumatic system failure when using overhauled or reconditioned pumps. An overhauled/reconditioned Parker/Airborne pump MUST NOT be used" If this service letter represents a real SB then people would be nuts to support these yahoos by buying another Parker pump product. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 168 | February 5th 08 05:32 PM |
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" | Robert M. Gary | Instrument Flight Rules | 137 | February 5th 08 05:32 PM |
The Good, the Bad, the Ugly: AirGizmo PIREP, PS Engineering CD/Intercom woes, XM "service" | Jay Honeck | Owning | 34 | December 15th 06 03:02 AM |
Old polish aircraft TS-8 "Bies" ("Bogy") - for sale | >pk | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 16th 06 07:48 AM |