![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anybody know the reason why they changed the empennage on the early B-17s?
I was watching the History Channel earlier today and wondered why they added the heavy strake to the tail. I admit the early B-17s looked like the tail would come off if stressed too much. Did this actually happen or was it a controllability issue for engine-out situations? -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN http://www.mortimerschnerd.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tail flapper failure | Veeduber | Home Built | 2 | May 22nd 04 06:52 AM |
twin tail questions | Kevin Horton | Home Built | 12 | January 2nd 04 03:21 PM |
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Bruce E. Butts | Home Built | 4 | July 26th 03 11:34 AM |
The prone postion for tail gunners versus turrets. | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 8 | July 22nd 03 11:01 PM |
The Tail Gunner Said It: 'I Love Them People' | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | July 7th 03 11:37 PM |