![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hobo wrote in message ... How indicative of maneaverability are the max G numbers of fighter aircraft? Also, most new aircraft have reported max of 9Gs. Why are they all coming out at this same number? Modern aircraft are capable of higher G turns; however, in order to stop the pilots from blacking/redding out and/or dying in their seat, the computer controlling the fly-by-wire / fly-by-light systems stops the turns going any higher. I think ![]() Cheers Graeme |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Old Plans, New Part Numbers | [email protected] | Home Built | 3 | December 16th 04 10:25 AM |
NACA Numbers??? | c hinds | Home Built | 3 | October 11th 04 09:40 PM |
Press fit numbers? | Boelkowj | Home Built | 1 | April 29th 04 06:51 PM |
Any Canadians Who Can Provide Numbers on a Champ, Taylorcraft, or Luscombe with Warp Drive Propeller? | Larry Smith | Home Built | 7 | December 21st 03 09:39 PM |
Darpa contract numbers | - = krusty = - | Home Built | 9 | July 23rd 03 03:22 AM |