![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 26, 7:58*am, "Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message news ![]() es330td wrote: Fortune magazine online has a photo essay about their new 787. *On one page, http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/...y.boeing_dream..., they make this statement: The Dreamliner's wingspan is 197 feet, or about 25% longer than a similar-sized plane, which increases lift and reduces drag. I thought that lift, in addition to causing a net upward force on the wing, also contributes to the drag force on the wing as well. If this is the case then increasing lift should also increase drag. *Did I misunderstand? The lift and drag curves for any given wing are a function of wing design. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
wide wingspan and good lift to drag ratios | Tony | Piloting | 6 | March 13th 06 01:19 AM |
8 Percent More Lift and 32 Percent Less Drag | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 9 | September 7th 05 12:02 AM |
about lift and drag coefficient for cessna C-160 | Grandss | Piloting | 9 | August 15th 05 06:15 PM |
Lift-to-Drag Ratio? | Toks Desalu | Home Built | 6 | November 23rd 03 10:53 PM |
Drag - Anti/Drag Wires | log | Home Built | 3 | August 28th 03 07:06 AM |