![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
U.S. Private-Jet Fuel Taxes Rise 65% in Senate Accord
By John Hughes April 25 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. business-jet owners would pay 65 percent more in fuel taxes to finance federal air-traffic control upgrades, under an agreement among Senate leaders. The levy would increase to 36 cents a gallon from 21.8 cents now, under the accord announced in a statement today in Washington by Senator Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat. Airline passenger fees and taxes wouldn't rise, he said. The agreement between Rockefeller, chairman of the Senate aviation subcommittee, and Montana Democrat Max Baucus, who runs the Senate Finance Committee, ends a seven-month standoff that stalled an aviation-funding bill. Today's deal clears the way for an April 28 vote to bring the bill to the full Senate. Rockefeller wanted to double fuel taxes for corporate aircraft while cutting fees for airlines, which he said paid disproportionately for aviation services. Instead, he settled for the smaller boost, so that small-jet owners will pay 5 percent of federal aviation costs, up from 3 percent. ``This agreement is a good down payment toward ending the growing inequities that exist between airline passengers and corporate jet users,'' Rockefeller said in the statement. The House approved its version of the funding legislation, which would finance the Federal Aviation Administration through 2011, on Sept. 20. The House bill, which would boost business jet-fuel taxes to 35.9 cents a gallon, and the final Senate proposal would need to be reconciled in a conference committee before being sent to President George W. Bush for his signature. Bush Veto Threat The Bush administration threatened in June to veto the House legislation, saying it doesn't meet needs such as creating user fees to pass on even higher charges to business-jet operators. U.S. airlines backed the Bush position on user fees. Today's Senate agreement means that the user fees, which business-jet owners viewed as more burdensome than higher fuel taxes, are in neither version of the legislation. The National Business Aviation Association, a Washington- based trade group for business-jet operators, said its members support funding the FAA and improving air-traffic control technology ``with a reasonable fuel tax.'' ``We applaud the continuing work Congress has done on this very important issue,'' Ed Bolen, the association's chief executive officer, said in a statement. Airlines' View An airline trade group called the tax increase for business-jet users ``a step in the right direction.'' ``It still falls short of the costs they impose on the system,'' James May, president of the Washington-based Air Transport Association, said in an e-mailed statement. ``We will remain engaged with these committees as the remainder of the package is developed.'' While losing the battle for user fees, airlines gained other benefits in the Senate legislation, which doesn't increase their costs. The House version raises airline passenger ticket charges for airport improvements to as much as $7 from $4.50, which would generate $1.1 billion a year. The Senate bill also creates a new $400 million FAA account dedicated to upgrading the air-traffic control system. Raising the excise tax on fuel used by private jet owners will bring in an additional $240 million a year. ************************************************** ************************************************** As always with tax laws, "divide and conquer" is the order of the day. The strategy is to get each segment of aviation pointing at each other, so that we all forget the fact that there is NO reason to give the Feds a nickel more. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How did KPHX Class B get so screwed up? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 19 | February 2nd 08 09:49 AM |
How did KPHX Class B get so screwed up? | Bertie the Bunyip[_24_] | Piloting | 2 | February 1st 08 04:23 PM |
How did KPHX Class B get so screwed up? | [email protected] | Piloting | 7 | January 31st 08 11:56 PM |
Controller screwed up? | Paul Tomblin | Piloting | 51 | September 14th 07 09:59 PM |
Don't Want to be Screwed | [email protected] | Home Built | 5 | May 22nd 04 06:58 AM |