![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kyle Boatright" wrote in message . .. "Yama" wrote in message ... "Scott Ferrin" wrote in message ... He also seems to have left out the ESM system which is quite elaborate in the F-22. It can take an AMRAAM shot with it without even using it's main radar. Also he was incorrect on the F-22's speed. The mach 1.7 he lists in in dry thrust and it wasn't even max military power. Paul Metz stated on a Discovery special that the maximum speed of the F-22 is classified but that it will go Mach 2.5. To quote him ". . .it's fast, I mean it's REALLY fast. It's top speed is classifed but it will do Mach 2.5" This suggests that the top speed in afterburner is over Mach 2.5. Paul Metz is the chief test pilot of the F-22 program. I am sceptical. Doesn't F-22 have fixed intakes? Speeds over mach 2.0 are pretty much impossible to attain with fixed intakes. Besides, such speeds require some special materials in radome, canopy etc. which tend to be more expensive, may not be compatible with stealth requirements etc. What I've seen for F-22 speeds as in combat configuration are mach 1.4-1.5 with supercruise, and 1.8 to 2.0 with afterburner. YF-23 was said to be faster, especially with F120 engines. The F-104 was a 50's design with fixed intakes, and was able to achieve well over M 2.0, so Mach 2+ is doable with fixed intakes. With 40+ more years of intake design development, even more *should* be possible. The intakes on an F104 had a (fixed) centerbody to generate shock within the inlet. A plain inlet seems to be limited to right at M2.0 (F16-land). There's a boundary-layer splitter on the F-22 inlet but that appears to be that. The point is largely moot because those other airplanes can only hit high Mach numbers clean and in AB (ie, for a few minutes). There've been a lot of religious arguments here about what "true supercruise" is and what airplanes can do it and it plainly has to mean "with ordnance aboard" or it means nothing at all. The F-22 is certainly the fastest airplane in the world with anything more than a tank full of cannon ammunition and possibly a pair of wing-tip missiles. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Performance Comparison Sheet | Ed Baker | Home Built | 6 | December 2nd 04 02:14 AM |
Aerobatic engine IO-360 AEIO-360 comparison | Jay Moreland | Aerobatics | 5 | October 6th 04 01:52 AM |
spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 05:47 AM |
EMW A6 Comparison to X-15 | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 8 | October 2nd 03 02:26 AM |
Best Fighter For It's Time | Tom Cooper | Military Aviation | 63 | July 29th 03 03:22 AM |