![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Noel wrote:
In article , Tina wrote: I understand how positive dihedral helps dynamic stability in airplanes, but some big ones, like the Russian An 124 Condor, has a pronounced negative dihedral -- the wings have a noticeable downward slope. Q1: Do those airplanes need active fly by wire controls to maintain stability, or is something else at play that keeps them right side up? Q2: Does anyone have a design rationalization for such a configuration, as opposed to just zero dihedral? I can appreciate why fighters have it -- they exploit lack of aerodynamic stability for rapid maneuvers -- but transports that spend their whole life being straight and level are another issue. Note: I have not morphed into an Mx clone! Don't know why, but don't those transports with negative dihedral also have wings above the hull? So those aircraft have the CG below the wings. And large transport aircraft are amongst the most aerodynamically stable aircraft to fly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another old negative | Don Pyeatt | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 2nd 08 05:32 PM |
"predator' dihedral | Phil Rhodes | Naval Aviation | 5 | May 25th 07 09:54 PM |
Wing dihedral | Dallas | Piloting | 35 | March 20th 06 04:01 PM |
how to cope with negative g´s? | Markus | Aerobatics | 6 | July 2nd 05 12:00 AM |
Biplane wing dihedral | vincent p. norris | General Aviation | 20 | June 18th 05 02:58 AM |