![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Kyle Boatright" wrote in
: "Tina" wrote in message news:d9fb071f-4d30-45c3-916d-3e4c00f89d52@ 34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com.. . I understand how positive dihedral helps dynamic stability in airplanes, but some big ones, like the Russian An 124 Condor, has a pronounced negative dihedral -- the wings have a noticeable downward slope. Q1: Do those airplanes need active fly by wire controls to maintain stability, or is something else at play that keeps them right side up? Q2: Does anyone have a design rationalization for such a configuration, as opposed to just zero dihedral? I can appreciate why fighters have it -- they exploit lack of aerodynamic stability for rapid maneuvers -- but transports that spend their whole life being straight and level are another issue. Note: I have not morphed into an Mx clone! Dihedral (or anhedral - negative dihedral) are both used to reposition the aircraft's Center of Lift (CL) vs the aircraft's CG. This effectively creates a pendulum, which wants to stabilize with the heavy part at the lowest possible position. Like a pendulum, relatively speaking, the farther above the CG the CL is, the more stable an aircraft will be. The whole "dihedral increases roll stability" issue is based around this, not increased or decreased roll due to lifting forces stemming from the attitude of the airplane. The roll forces which create stability are due to this pendulum effect. If you want a stable aircraft in roll, add as much dihedral as possible to raise the CL. If you want an unstable aircraft, do the opposite. The anhedral on some on high wing transports is probably designed to give a desired amount of stability. Some level of stability is great for a transport, but you don't want to create an aircraft so stable it requires oversized ailerons to generate the desired roll rate. All correct! Also, anhedral helps a bit with the high alt dutch roll case. I'd have to go into a lengthy explanation to cover it all, but suffice it to say that swept wing airplanes are subject to a roll yaw reversal at high altitues that can get rather unpleasnt ( complet loss of control) Most must fly with a yaw damper, which is a gyro-controlled rudder input that keeps the thing going straight. Anhedral offers a non mechanical ad to ammelierating this effect. In fact, the russians are notoriously clever at this sort of thing, which is why thye have madly maneuverable fighters with more or less conventional control systems while contemporary western aircraft relied on computers to achieve the same results. Bertie Bertie |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Another old negative | Don Pyeatt | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 2nd 08 06:32 PM |
| "predator' dihedral | Phil Rhodes | Naval Aviation | 5 | May 25th 07 10:54 PM |
| Wing dihedral | Dallas | Piloting | 35 | March 20th 06 05:01 PM |
| how to cope with negative g´s? | Markus | Aerobatics | 6 | July 2nd 05 01:00 AM |
| Biplane wing dihedral | vincent p. norris | General Aviation | 20 | June 18th 05 03:58 AM |