If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
GIVEN CURRENT WARS, F-35s ARE BETTER CHOICE THAN MORE F-22As
On Jun 13, 12:15*am, Jack Linthicum
wrote: On Jun 12, 11:58 am, Zombywoof wrote: On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:30:41 GMT, Yeff wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:05:34 -0700 (PDT), Jack Linthicum wrote: I went through a long discussion on this newsgroup advocating a carrier-able version of the A-10 Not gonna happen. *Increase the strength of the landing gear and you sacrifice the amount of ordnance you can carry. or a new design. Yeah, something with an incredible sensor suite, stealthy, and a good bomb load. *Hey, maybe we could modify the F-35? One of the versions of the F-35 is for Carriers. *Part of the whole design concept behind it. *One Aircraft with 80% parts interchangeability reduces design, production & maintenance costs. One of my concerns is that with the F-22 & F-35 the USAF once again appears to be neglecting the Close Air Support role which is always going to be needed regardless of the amount of Air Superiority. *I know that they are "predicting" that the F-35 will take over some of that role, but a "Fast-Burner" is not the most effective platform for the CAS mission, especially at its 100 million+ price tag. Perhaps the *SM-47 Super Machete needs to be given a closer look at for this role as the A-10 ages. *After all it projected that the SM-47 will be produced in manned, as well as unmanned/remote pilot-in-the-loop and unmanned autonomous configurations. At I think a projected cost of 10 Million each, a much better alternative to the 100 Million+ F-35. *It also doesn't leave our field personnel without a good strong CAS platform once the A-10 dies of old age. Seehttp://www.stavatti.com/SM47_OVERVIEW.htmlformore 411 -- "Everything in excess! To enjoy the flavor of life, take big bites. Moderation is for monks." Yes, an unmanned CAS aircraft would have the same attention to the job as the manned USAF versions. The USAF hates CAS because it doesn't win medals and gets them in bar fights. Maybe the Pentagon should give the whole CAS to the Army, army will select the plane, army pilot will fly the mission, I'm sure more attention would be paid to it under the Army. USAF hates it anyway, I know it's not gonna happen because USAF wants to control every flyable asset in the military. But secretary of defense, the president should show the leadership and just order it to be done. It's always better to have something under the control of somebody who actually have the incentive to develop it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Logger Choice | Jamie Denton | Soaring | 10 | July 6th 07 03:13 PM |
Headset Choice | jad | Piloting | 14 | August 9th 06 07:59 AM |
Which DC Headphone is best choice? | [email protected] | Piloting | 65 | June 27th 06 11:50 PM |
!! HELP GAMERS CHOICE | Dave | Military Aviation | 2 | September 3rd 04 04:48 PM |
!!HELP GAMERS CHOICE | Dave | Soaring | 0 | September 3rd 04 12:01 AM |