![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 19, 1:19 pm, Le Chaud Lapin wrote:
On the one hand, some complain that rate of increase in pilot population is too low. On the other, things that would lead to more pilots getting into the air are frowned upon (ultra-commoditized components). We see new designs every year. More fancy electronic autopilots and nav stuff, more engine FADEC stuff, more safety stuff like parachutes. But fewer people still fly, because all of that fancy stuff is so expensive. Most end up flying 35 or 50 year old airplanes because that's what they can afford. Airliners have had fly-by-wire for some time now but they're no cheaper than they were to fly when they were mechanical. In fact, it takes an army of highly-paid avionics techs to keep them safe and flyable. It's deregulation of the industry in the 1970s that brought air travel within the reach of the common man, not electronics, and the resulting tiny margin of profit for airlines in a highly competitive environment has resulted in many bankruptcies since then. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F-100 detail | Pjmac35 | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 26th 07 10:29 AM |
Finding "Neutral" Position on Piper Elevator/Trim Tab | [email protected] | Owning | 10 | December 7th 06 01:43 PM |
Detail pops in too late in FS2004 | CatharticF1 | Simulators | 0 | August 27th 03 03:25 AM |