Why no F/24 -34?

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

		Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Why no F/24 -34?

Home

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Display Modes

December 16th 03, 05:46 PM

Steven P. McNicoll

external usenet poster

Posts: n/a

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om...

For another example, look at the world-famous RS-71.

Oops, Lyndon Johnson called it the "SR-71."

Change the name...

Of course, RS-71 wouldn't have fit any better into the designation system.

Report this post as spam, offensive or inappropriate

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:15 AM.