XM question for Garmin 396/496 owers

Jay Honeck wrote:
(presumably, Stella wrote, but Jay snipped the credit, so all bets are off)
Not counting the McCain donors who've been pretending to be converted
Hilary supporters, the real former Hilary supporters don't plan to
vote against Obama, a man, by casting their vote for McCain, another
man whose politics are all the opposite of the party they support.
Even if he trots out a woman whose foreign policy expertise consists
of being located somewhere right across the ocean from Russia.

Another interesting aspect of Palin's choice as Veep is that the Obama
people *can't* criticize Palin's lack of experience without the
spotlight reflecting right back on their candidate's woeful lack of
testing.

That cuts both ways. Not only did McCain pull the rug out from under his own
argument, but Palin is completely "untested" with no national-level
experience at all.

Bottom line: Palin has more experience (and, more importantly, more
*executive* experience running a state government) than Obama has in
the Senate.

Well, only the shallow thinkers would conclude that without any details.
There are many office holders that are "experienced" in ways that we would
not want to suffer. I'll wait for the vetting process to decide about Palin.

BTW: Your choice of language -- and bias -- is telling, Stella.
Imagine, a man "trotting out" a woman, like this is some sort of
equestrian event?

It's better than McCain's attitude as reflected in his offering up Cindy as
a porno contestant at Sturgis. Or, did you miss that one?

Neil