A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Protestor Damages Enola Gay



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old December 18th 03, 09:43 AM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: jake

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:39:19 +0900, Ernest Schaal
wrote:

The Japanese military infrastructure and capacity to wage effective war may
have already been destroyed, and sensible people would have quit under those
circumstances, but according to at least one Japan Times story the military
was quite willing to sacrifice the lives of all Japanese civilians rather
than stand the shame of living with those civilians after losing the war.


sure...
I dont doubt it for a moment..throughout human history meglomaniacs
have always been prepared to do so..

but they were the ravings of defeated meglomaniacs who had LOST their
power.

Most sources I know of talk about the resistance of the military to
surrender, and the uncommon action of the Emperor of resisting the military
on this matter.


Indeed ..
but the Japanese military had already been defeated..

The nuclear bombs were dropped for other reasons than military..

Nagasaki was chosen as a target almost randomly by the pilot
because of weather conditions..on the strength of it having a
Mitsubushi factory there..



You don't read much hsitory do you? Nagasaki was on a list of targets given to
the aircrew. Nothing "almost random" there. There were several cities, 5 or 6
IIRC, that were selected for primary or alternate nuke targets.

As for the Japanese military being defeated by August 1945 tell that to the
bunch of fully functional combat units in China, Viet Nam, Korea etc. It wasn't
until the Soviets entered the Pacific war that the Japanese forces were facing
defeat in China. If Japan hadn't surrendered who knows how long the war in
China would have lasted. The Japanese had a lot of things to cover up and had
no intention of leaving easily.

As for the Home Islands every civilian was to be armed with everything from
sharpened bamboo sticks to real weapons. Let's assume 50% of the civilians
actually acted in the invasions the number of American and Japanese casualties
would have been unbelievable. How many children would have been slaughtered?
How many suicides? Thank God we will never know.

This made the atomic bombings a military necessity. Add the casualties in
China, Korea etc to those involved in the invasions and you get numbers too big
for most people to comprehend.

I will admit there were also political reasons for dropping the bombs, but they
HAD to be used primarilay for military reasons.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements me Military Aviation 146 January 15th 04 10:13 PM
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological ArtKramr Military Aviation 19 December 20th 03 02:47 AM
Japanese Whine Over Enola Gay Display [email protected] Military Aviation 42 December 19th 03 11:32 PM
enola gay Cub Driver Military Aviation 1 November 7th 03 01:01 AM
Enola Gay flies into new A-bomb controversy Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 August 21st 03 09:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.