![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:
"Gord Beaman" wrote in message .. . "Dudley Henriques" wrote: "Gord Beaman" wrote in message .. . -Gord. "You are completely focused on RPM as the single factor producing rotational velocity" -Dude Henrickles .........whereas the high rpm governor limit, impossible to eliminate from the equation for the purpose of establishing seizure momentum as power is reduced , (and thus affecting the rpm) is the other factor. :-) Ok...I'll work with you a little here...(and only if you refrain from obfuscation). Your above statement isn't valid because it's the RPM only which is relevant to the momentum of a prop (besides the mass which isn't variable in this case) What caused the RPM is completely immaterial. You say 'It's the other factor' but it is not. There's only one parameter that determines momentum (besides mass) and that's RPM. -- -Gord. Ok, and I'd like to work with you a bit also if I can. I kind of miss the old days when the two of us were talking to each other. You are absolutely right in everything you are saying here as well as what you said back in the seizure thread. I never doubted your knowledge and experience with these things for a moment. I believe the problem involved both of us misunderstanding the other. I had assumed the limiter would reduce the rpm when the power was reduced back to idle in prep for the bail out. I should have mentioned that in my dialog with the poster I was dealing with when you entered the thread, but I didn't. You no doubt thought, from the way I posted my remarks that I was under the impression that it was power that controlled the seizure momentum. When you posted without mentioning the limiter, I grossly over reacted to the inference that I didn' t know what I was talking about. I shouldn't have done that and I apologize. You on the other hand, could have asked me to clarify whether or not I was dealing with the issue without the limiter in question. You didn't. The rest went downhill in a handbasket. I answered several of your posts thinking you knew about the rpm change with the limiter involved and were lecturing me anyway, which of course would have been wrong. By the time I realized we were talking about different things, it was too late. Gordo, I am sincerely sorry for my part in this misunderstanding. I don't believe either one of us, after spending all our lives involved with airplanes and engines, is ignorant of the simple fact that it's rpm that determines rotational velocity. Let's put this thing to bed and forget it if possible. To be honest with you, I hate all this unnecessary crap going back and forth between two people who should be friends. Sincerely, Dudley Ok, that's fine...let's let it rest till after Christmas...apologies to all for monopolizing the 'frequency'. Merry Christmas to you and yours. -- -Gord. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flyboys by James BradleyFlyboys by James Bradley | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 29th 03 01:30 AM |