A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flyboys?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #29  
Old December 19th 03, 04:42 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dudley Henriques" wrote:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .

-Gord.

"You are completely focused on RPM as the
single factor producing rotational velocity"
-Dude Henrickles

.........whereas the high rpm governor limit, impossible to eliminate

from
the equation for the purpose of establishing seizure momentum as power is
reduced , (and thus affecting the rpm) is the other factor. :-)


Ok...I'll work with you a little here...(and only if you refrain
from obfuscation).

Your above statement isn't valid because it's the RPM only which
is relevant to the momentum of a prop (besides the mass which
isn't variable in this case)

What caused the RPM is completely immaterial.

You say 'It's the other factor' but it is not. There's only one
parameter that determines momentum (besides mass) and that's RPM.
--

-Gord.


Ok, and I'd like to work with you a bit also if I can. I kind of miss the
old days when the two of us were talking to each other.

You are absolutely right in everything you are saying here as well as what
you said back in the seizure thread. I never doubted your knowledge and
experience with these things for a moment. I believe the problem involved
both of us misunderstanding the other. I had assumed the limiter would
reduce the rpm when the power was reduced back to idle in prep for the bail
out. I should have mentioned that in my dialog with the poster I was dealing
with when you entered the thread, but I didn't. You no doubt thought, from
the way I posted my remarks that I was under the impression that it was
power that controlled the seizure momentum. When you posted without
mentioning the limiter, I grossly over reacted to the inference that I didn'
t know what I was talking about. I shouldn't have done that and I apologize.
You on the other hand, could have asked me to clarify whether or not I was
dealing with the issue without the limiter in question. You didn't. The rest
went downhill in a handbasket. I answered several of your posts thinking you
knew about the rpm change with the limiter involved and were lecturing me
anyway, which of course would have been wrong. By the time I realized we
were talking about different things, it was too late.
Gordo, I am sincerely sorry for my part in this misunderstanding.
I don't believe either one of us, after spending all our lives involved with
airplanes and engines, is ignorant of the simple fact that it's rpm that
determines rotational velocity. Let's put this thing to bed and forget it if
possible. To be honest with you, I hate all this unnecessary crap going back
and forth between two people who should be friends.
Sincerely,
Dudley

Ok, that's fine...let's let it rest till after
Christmas...apologies to all for monopolizing the 'frequency'.

Merry Christmas to you and yours.
--

-Gord.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flyboys by James BradleyFlyboys by James Bradley Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 29th 03 01:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.