![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My flying club just replaced the DG and AI in a C172 in which I have many hours with an Aspen PFD1000 Pro. They are requiring everyone to take a ground school in the unit before flying the aircraft again because this aircraft is now a "TAA." I dispute that. There's still no GPS+moving map -- IFR certified or otherwise. The Aspen will only provide a primitive map with flight plan and nearby waypoints provided by another GPS; the built-in GPS only provides emergency reversion. (There is no other GPS in the aircraft.) The AC has no autopilot, either, but that's not technically required to be a TAA -- though it's certainly in keeping with the spirit of the concept. Neither of the replaced instruments are even required for VFR flight, and what does it matter if I'm an expert at using the PFD? Besides, to a first approximation (no button pushing) the PFD provides the same info the old instruments did without me having to know or do much of anything. (Well, the HSI *is* different than a DG+CDI.) They're only asking for $50 for a few hours of ground school but the principle of the thing just bugs me. Am I being a crazy stick-in-the-mud? -- dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MX-20 panel question | Paul kgyy | Piloting | 12 | December 14th 07 01:53 AM |
Ground launching equipment question | [email protected] | Soaring | 26 | November 13th 07 04:52 PM |
A trivial panel question... | Jim Stewart | Owning | 2 | September 26th 07 11:09 PM |
Audio panel observation/question | Mike Noel | Owning | 0 | January 12th 06 03:35 AM |
Garmin audio panel question | Brinks | Owning | 1 | September 10th 03 08:41 PM |