A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

2009 Proposed US Contest Rules Changes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old January 11th 09, 07:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 193
Default 2009 Proposed US Contest Rules Changes

On Jan 11, 6:31*am, PMSC Member wrote:
Do the benefits of "start anywhere" outweigh the disadvantages?


My impression is that most pilots who have flown with start anywhere
hae liked it. The discussion here has been mostly about the proposed
modification that the RC is proposing before the rule goes into effect
for Nationals in 2009. The focus of the discussion is whether the
change addresses a real problem.

I took a look at the first day at Region 9 in 2008 to try to
understand at least one example of pilot behavior under the start
anywhere rule.

In Std, 15M and and 18M (all using the same start cylinder) 29 pilots
started through the top of the cylinder, 5 started out the side -
mostly close to the courseline. Roughly 2/3 of the pilots started in
the front half of the cylinder, but starts were distributed all over
the cylinder with the largest "gaggle" of starters comprised of 4
gliders.

Climb rates for out the top starters were as follows: 6 at1.8-3.9kts,
9 at 4-4.9 kts, 5 at 5-6 kts, 5 at 6-7 kts and 4 at 7-8 kts. A number
of the start climbs were for more than 4,000' gains. There appeared to
be pretty good correlation between higher climb rates at the start and
pilots at the top of the scoresheet at the end of the contest, so
perhaps the difference in climb is more a result of strategy than
luck. I'll take a look at some more contest days time permitting.

Overall there's nothing of concern and some potential strategic
insights that might be useful here.

9B
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FAA publishes proposed changes to amateur-built rules. Jim Logajan Home Built 19 July 28th 08 08:30 AM
2009 U.S. Contest Locations/Dates Tim[_2_] Soaring 2 February 28th 08 05:48 PM
2008 Proposed US Competition Rules Changes [email protected] Soaring 18 December 31st 07 07:21 PM
US Contest Rules Proposed Changes for 2006 Ken Sorenson Soaring 18 January 12th 06 04:30 PM
Proposed 2005 Rules On SRA Site Ken Kochanski (KK) Soaring 79 January 27th 05 06:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.