![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It appears that the Air Force is experimenting with non-rated UAV "pilots".
Since as a civilian pilot I could potentially be sharing the same airspace with these folks, I am not sure this gives me a warm, fuzzy feeling. Of course, the government could always "solve" any potential problem with more restricted airspace... Vaughn "Citing a projected shortfall of 1,500 pilots over the next decade, the U.S. Air Force has begun training 10 non-pilots to fly unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs. The Air Force says UAVs flew 400,000 hours in 2008, double the rate of the previous year. Because every sortie requires support from seven people on the ground, officials say existing fighter and bomber personnel simply cannot keep up with demand. FlightGlobal.com (3/12) " |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
News flash: pilots are "allowed" to use supplemental oxygen | VARR | Soaring | 8 | August 17th 08 04:54 PM |
Plane "sharing" experience? | [email protected] | Piloting | 38 | December 24th 07 05:35 PM |
"Fly Baby, you violated Class B Airspace" | Ron Wanttaja | Piloting | 27 | September 5th 07 08:30 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Connecticut To Get "Creamed" By Airspace Redesign Change? | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 0 | August 8th 06 02:42 PM |