![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Having referred to an 'orphaned' engine shortly after being diagnosed
with an incurable form of cancer lead to a gross misunderstanding as to the immediacy of my demise, with me being carried out the door, X's for eyes with a wrench still clutched in my hand. Last June I was diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma. Although there is no cure, it IS a treatable form of cancer and I'm doing everything I can to stave off the inevitable. The misunderstanding arose from my mention of an ORPHANED engine. An orphaned engine is one that is no longer supported by it's manufacturer, such as the twenty MILLION or so air-cooled Volkswagens. And even then, the term isn't very accurate, for while Volkswagen of Germany no longer supports the air-cooled engine, Volkswagen of Mexico continues to manufacture air-cooled crate engines. But the worst part of this misunderstanding has to do with a particular configuration of an air cooled Volkswagen engine that has been converted for use in a light plane. The purpose of this message is to try and clarify that particular misunderstanding. When someone mentions a VW engine converted for flight a majority of people assume you are speaking of a big-bore stroker. And a big-bore stroker can be an expensive proposition. Why so expensive? Mostly because of all the machining needed. Which may not make much sense until you realize they are talking about BIG bore strokers -- engines of 140cid and up. (What's the biggest of the big bore strokers? Probably the full-trick aluminum-cased Type IV's with a set of 101mm jugs on top of a forged 90mm crankshaft. That's 175 cubic inches. And a lot of machining. But that's not what I was referring to when I mentioned 'orphaned' engines. I was referring to the often overlooked method of increasing the displacement without having to do any machining at all. That is, to simply install a crankshaft having a longer throw. Auto-makers regularly design-in this method of displacement growth to sustain interest in their product-line. This method of increasing the displacement of the VW engine should be of particular interest to homebuilders because there are a number of single-place designs that fly perfectly well behind a VW conversion of stock displacement... and fly even better when using an 1834cc engine. But the 1834 can be an expensive proposition, requiring machining of the case and heads to accept 92mm jugs. By comparison, a 1700cc engine -- the result of running STOCK jugs over a 74mm crankshaft -- requires NO machining at all. An added plus would be to use longer connecting rods, taking advantage of the greater dwell at TDC to enhance the engine's low-end torque, making it more suitable for bolting to a propeller than to a box of gears. -R.S.Hoover |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Homebuilt Engine, Part 1 | [email protected] | Home Built | 9 | October 22nd 08 01:44 PM |
[09/12] - P-38 starboard engine detail.JPG (1/1) Part 3 | Waldo.Pepper[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 2 | September 12th 08 04:46 PM |
Double Eagle + orphaned engine = a winner? | Anthony W | Home Built | 18 | July 31st 08 02:58 AM |
Orphaned Engine | [email protected] | Home Built | 17 | July 22nd 08 11:41 PM |
Saturn V F-1 Engine Testing at F-1 Engine Test Stand 6866986.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 1 | April 11th 07 04:48 PM |