![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark and Kim Smith" wrote in message ... Supposedly this Stryker Force is supposed to be anywhere in the world in 96 hours ( I think that was the time quoted ) and that the Air Force wasn't up to that. I don't know what the hell a "Stryker Force" is, but if you are referring to the Stryker Brigade Combat Team, the goal is 96 hours. As to whether or not the USAF can manage that, it would largely depend upon the level of committment it has to other requirements--if DoD says getting the SBCT into the theater is the top priority, airframes will be made available one way or another. The complaints were that their troop transports are too heavy. Ambiguous. The Stryker combat vehicle pushes (but does not exceed) the capability of the C-130, but it does not tax that of the larger strategic airlifters like the C-5 and C-17. Not to mention they had to add 2 tons of anti RPG protection to each machine causing their weight problems to increase. Again, ambiguous. IIRC that is extra applique armor you are referring to--it could be airlifted in after the initial closure on the aerial port of debarkation (APOD) if required. But if the method of transport is the C-5 or C-17, it can travel with it already installed. All the high tech stuff this Stryker Force has ain't gonna do much good if you can't get them there. Maybe the Army forgot to talk to the Air Force?? This stuff has been flung back and forth for a couple of years now. Simple answer is that the SBCT is a hell of a lot lighter (and easier) to transport than the next heavier asset (a heavy brigade combat team with its M1A2's, M2A2's, M109A6's, etc.), while it packs substantially more ground maneuver capability and protection than its next lighter component (the light infantry brigade combat team). It is a good tool to have in the grand toolbox of military operations for the US military--they were not quite ready when the balloon went up for OIF (the first SBCT just became fully operational this past year), so the Army had to try and get a heavy force into Northern Iraq by air, resulting in IIRC about the equivalent of one battalion task force (minus, again IIRC) (which is only one-third of a heavy BCT) making it into that area by the time the units in the south made the link up. Had they had a SBCT ready to go we would have seen the entire brigade in the AO instead. Brooks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I -didn't- hear that | Harry K | Home Built | 2 | August 18th 04 07:27 PM |
Ever hear of a Rodman nibbler? | Ed Wischmeyer | Home Built | 4 | August 16th 04 02:04 PM |
Let's Hear It From Homebuilders Who Make Your Own Sunshields and Panel Glareshields | jls | Home Built | 10 | June 15th 04 06:07 AM |
Glad to hear the initial reports were wrong about accidents, as they usually are. | Tedstriker | Home Built | 0 | April 19th 04 02:52 AM |
Things you don't want to hear on a taxi test. | Dave Hyde | Home Built | 18 | December 11th 03 08:36 PM |