|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
January 6th 04, 05:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 16:49:36 +0000, Frank F. Matthews wrote:
Two wrongs don't make a right. However, the statement has nothing to do with the topic. Destruction is a part of war. It would be more likely to avoid war if you avoid starting one by attacking the other party. The destruction of Hiroshima was fully justified by it's result. In fact, it produced an end to the war with less impact on Japan than any other end that could be envisioned at the time. FFM None of which is anywhere near as significant as the impact it had on Stalin. Which looking at the Potsdam transcripts, was clearly the foremost thing on Truman's mind. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements) | B2431 | Military Aviation | 100 | January 12th 04 01:48 PM |
| Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements) | Linda Terrell | Military Aviation | 37 | January 7th 04 02:51 PM |
| Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other | B2431 | Military Aviation | 7 | December 29th 03 07:00 AM |
| Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and othermagnificent technological achievements) | mrraveltay | Military Aviation | 7 | December 23rd 03 01:01 AM |
| Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements) | Dick Locke | Military Aviation | 0 | December 22nd 03 06:10 PM |
Threaded Mode