![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been flying gliders for years, but the following question only
occurred to me recently: In mechanically compensated varios, the TE pressure is supposed to be as much below static as pitot is above that. That makes sense since "ram air pressure" increases as v^2, as does the kinetic energy of the ship. But pitot pressure is proportional to IAS, whereas the kinetic energy of the ship would seem to need TAS. If I haven't made a mistake (and please correct me if I have), TE compensation will only be correct at one altitude. At higher altitudes it will be under compensated, and at lower altitudes over compensated. Comments please! Martin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Young Eagles/Compensation | Kyle Boatright | Piloting | 6 | April 15th 06 12:03 AM |
Pilot Compensation - FAR 61.113 | CAE | Piloting | 12 | February 7th 06 10:21 PM |
Compensation vs. Cost sharing? | Mark Morissette | Piloting | 9 | April 19th 05 05:42 AM |
Cambridge 302 compensation opinions | Caracole | Soaring | 8 | June 27th 04 08:19 PM |
interview travel compensation | David Martin | Piloting | 1 | June 4th 04 03:40 AM |