A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Airbus Story (FWIW)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old June 29th 09, 12:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Richard[_11_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 64
Default Airbus Story (FWIW)

On Jun 28, 9:36*pm, James Robinson wrote:
spanky wrote:

Why would they be using rudder at cruising speed? *Further, according
to the discussion in some of the other groups, the rudder limiter is
still effective in alternate law. It supposedly clamps the limit at
where it was when the shift was made from normal to alternate law.


...look at the first line in the ACARS messages: RUD TRV LIM FAULT...
in other words, the rudder travel limiter not doing what it was
supposed to do, i.e., limit the rudder travel. *


My understanding from the pros in other groups, is that message simply
says that the autolimiter disconnected, and as mentioned, the limits are
clamped at what they were prior to the disconnect. *It is supposedly
part of the change from normal to alternate law.

This was followed in fairly short order by a TCAS fault, an
autothrottle disconnect, a/p disconnect and institution of alternate
flight law algorithms. *
Look at the failure point of the 447 vertical
stab and compare that with the failure point of the AA 300 that went
down in 2001 on departure from JFK. *


They are different. *Not at all the same type of attachment or type of
failure.

Despite having a rudder travel limiter in place and working,


The A300 was not a FBW aircraft.

the 2001 incident proved rather markedly that it is entirely possible,
even at climb speeds, to overstress the vertical attach points of the
structure. *...at cruise, in what may have been beyond extreme
turbulence, that possibility may indeed be a probability in this case.


Why would an experienced pilot be using the rudder at all at cruising
speed and at that altitude?

We'll never know until the FDRs and CVRs are found and the data
downloaded, but on that subject I have no faith that they will be
found and, given Airbus's shenanigans with black boxes from earlier
incidents, I have no faith that the company wants them to be found.


So they will just hope no other aircraft decide to disappear while in
cruise flight? Or do you think they already know what went wrong, and are
correcting it behind the curtain?


Look at the behaviour of US Scare and Boeing with the 737 rudder
reversal problem.

"Problem? There is no problem" Meanwhile, back at Area 51, er,
Seattle, all manner of work towards a solution is being performed.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FWIW - One magazine's top ten harrowing airports Paul T. Aviation Photos 2 April 13th 08 06:59 PM
FWIW, Moller Again ? Al G[_2_] Piloting 62 July 12th 07 06:59 PM
FWIW, Moller Again ? Al G[_2_] Home Built 65 July 12th 07 06:59 PM
airbus - Latest Plane From Airbus.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 14 June 26th 07 09:41 AM
Soviet Ekranoplan redux, FWIW Ogden Johnson III Naval Aviation 0 March 23rd 04 08:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.