![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 29, 5:28*am, "Panic" wrote:
That crab "correction" was the hardest thing to get used to when I flew the B-52H back in the early 60s. * We had a little chart near the rudder control knob to enter the angle and velocity of the crosswind, then we pulled up on the knob and cranked it to the chart value to hydraulically move the main gear so that it would be aligned with the runway even though we landed still in a crab. * We could crank up to 20° of alignment correction. All of my previous years, once we finally saw the runway at very low altitude we'd kick out the crab and use wing low cross control for landing. GCA minimums were 100' ceiling. *You had to psyche yourself ahead of time to insure that when you finally spotted the runway you'd leave the crab in and land that way. *(but...make sure you entered the crab correction in the right direction) "BeechSundowner" wrote in message ... On Sep 26, 8:46 pm, a wrote: On Sep 26, 11:10 am, " wrote: I noticed when you broke out at 500 feet agl you aligned the axis of the airplane with the runway then tended to drift a little left, and coordinated turned yourself onto the center line again. Absolutely nothing wrong with that, but my habit is a little different. I continue to fly the localizer at whatever crab angle I need to keep the needle centered and when much lower drop the windward wing, kick the airplane into alignment and transition to a cross wind landing. It would be interesting for the thread to address the advantanges and disadvantages of each method. A, While IMC, I do exactly what you say, fly the crab all the way down. Problem and why you see me drift left when I break out was I was 1/2 dot off fthe localizer to the right, so in order to find the centerline, it required a slight turn to the left when I broke out 512 MSL or *200 AGL. You can see my "reintercept" of the centerline from 7:20 to to 7:30 by watching the point of the cowling in relationship to the runway centerline. *During this 10 seconds, I was correcting the right of the localizer problem. Couple of thoughts, as I did not even realize until breaking out that I had that much of a crab as I was so focused on maintaining the localizer. . *It took several adjustments of the header bug on descent to find that sweet spot in tracking. *When I broke out, needless to say I was surprised at my crab angle (like, oh crap, where's the runway!), and thus the sharp "response on the yoke" *My subsequent approaches were not that abrupt on the yoke as I was better prepared. Didn't you know the x-wind factor for the runway you were using? Cheers |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ILS approach and VOR Alpha Approach video | DOCTOR Mary Ellen Hall McIntire Yasay, Ph.D, (Div.) | Piloting | 3 | May 22nd 08 01:52 PM |
ILS approach and VOR Alpha Approach video | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | May 22nd 08 02:15 AM |
ILS approach and VOR Alpha Approach video | [email protected] | Piloting | 4 | May 17th 08 01:19 PM |
First approach to minimums | Steven Barnes | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 21st 05 07:47 PM |
CAT II Minimums on a CAT I Approach | Giwi | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | July 24th 03 07:46 AM |