![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
a wrote:
My aerodynamic question had always been why there are fewer pusher props. In a puller some of the wind energy is used up against the airplane. In a pusher, the prop has to operate in turbulent air stirred up by the structure in front. Depending on the design of the airplane, the prop also has to be stronger (e.g., heavier) to withstand the cycling loads if there's a wing or something blocking part of the prop disk from the slipstream (think Long-EZ). Ron Wanttaja |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
US 269021 P63 Kingcobra 20070927 Columbus OH | Graham Harrison[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 14th 08 06:27 PM |
Engine power question??? | [email protected] | Home Built | 24 | October 13th 07 02:40 AM |
Ship's Power (or portable GPS) Question | Kyle Boatright | Home Built | 9 | May 29th 07 03:17 PM |
O-360 takeoff power fuel flow question | argon39 | Owning | 13 | August 2nd 05 05:23 PM |