A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old January 12th 04, 07:08 PM
Matt Wiser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"weary" wrote:

"Greg Hennessy" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 02:32:04 GMT, "weary"

wrote:


That would be Stimson who claimed that

Nagasaki was picked as the
primary
target for Fatman, when it clearly wasnt.

Even if this is true it says nothing about

Stimson except he was
confused on that point.


It clearly does.


And?


Of course you will give us the precise

quote detailing when exactly
*when*
this would have happened and you also tell

us how this information was
beamed back in time to allied planners

taking tough decisions.

The US was well aware of peace feelers being

put out by Japan at least
two months before the bombs were dropped..


Not by any japanese in any position to deliver

on a peace offer.

We don't know what would have happened if there
had been a
response to the feelers.


Nevermind Leahy whose own briefing to

truman put allied casualities
at
30-35% within 30 days of invasion.

But Leahy didn't think the landings would

be necessary.

Leahy wasnt sat in a foxhole in Okinawa.

Irrelevant as to what he thought, but introducing

irrelevancy
is your trademark, isn't it.


Not surprising, the allied butcher bill is

irrelevant to types like you.

He didn't think it would be necessary so his
estimate is irrelevant.



Weary, the peace feelers were mostly freelancing by Japanese diplomats
and military attaches in Sweden and Switzerland-when the Japanese in Switzerland
met with OSS Director Allen Dulles, he tread cautiously-as thanks to MAGIC
intercepts of their communications, he knew that they did not have the full
approval of the Japanese Government. They had the support of the peace faction
(PM, FM, Navy Minister), and the unspoken support of the Emperor himself,
but no full cabinet approval. If word had gotten out in Tokyo about the peace
faction's efforts, well,can you say "Government by assassination"?
(a common practice in Japan in the 1920s and 30s) Which means a military
government dedicated to continuing the war.

Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.