![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi folks,
I was in the process of purchasing an AA-5A cheetah this week and spoke with the owner about it. Pictures looked good and the specs were reasonable for the price. Then I inquire about damage and use. NDH, great. But then came the bombshell. I asked and he said that he sees around 112-115 KTAS in cruise at a 23-2400ish power settings. My jaw dropped to the floor. I asked if he had a Traveler instead of a cheetah, he assured me a cheetah is what he has. Something is not adding up. He was candid enough and asserted he could see me getting 120KTAS if you fly the thing wide open and he sure as heck has never seen the book number of 127. My question is this. I understand there is usually a difference between stated book numbers and real numbers, but he confidently (I appreciated his sincerity) asserted he would barely make 120KTAS with the thing wide open, which for the purposes of this discussion was validated by his GPS groundspeed with nominally no-wind. That is a 7-8 KTS difference from the book, more along the lines of what I would expect to see out of a traveler, which killed off the deal, and formally has me even reconsidering the Grumman line. So what's the scoop from those in the know? Are Grumman book numbers just outright bunk? Because I know I can get 115KTAS out of a 150HP 172, been there done that. Usually a 150HP 172 will stabilize in the 112KTS range, I can take than number to the bank. That is within 3 KTAS of the book, not bad for 30 yo spam cans. But when the cheetah book advertises 127 and you're struggling to keep 120 something is not right. ANybody have any experiences with the cheetah. I was looking for a 125KTAS/150HP aircraft, which is the only airspeed/engine combination that makes it worthwhile upgrading from the capital and operating cost of my runout 95KTAS/100HP flaking paint Cessna 150. If I wanted a 115KTAS I could go with a 150HP 172 and have more wide service support for the same money, yet it's not worth spending 2.5x the money to get an additional 15kts. I was considering the Traveler line, but if the cheetah numbers are so skewed, that means the traveler is really a 105KTAS aircraft, meh.. Thanks for the feedback |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Sale: IN THE COCKPIT VHS VIDEO SERIES - 6 Tape Series | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 2nd 06 04:12 PM |
Ancient Service Bulletin on Converting Continental A-Series and C-Series Engines to Higher Horsepower: 65 to 75HP, Etc. | jls | Home Built | 0 | February 21st 05 04:36 PM |
"zero" versus "oscar" versus "sierra" | Ron Garret | Piloting | 30 | December 20th 04 08:49 AM |
Lancaster book series question. | Richard Brooks | Military Aviation | 2 | August 26th 04 06:39 AM |
Armour Series Collectors - question for you please... | Tex Houston | Military Aviation | 0 | August 24th 03 03:25 PM |