![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Alan Minyard" wrote in message ... On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:42:19 +0100, "Mike" wrote: What I am saying is that the "suitcase" nuclear device does not exist. No one, not the French, not the Poles, not the UK and not the US, has them. The "micro thermonuclear bomb is a myth, and not a very good one. However the 'micro fission device' is very real. The USA produced the Special Atomic Demolition Munition (SADM) that would fit in a large duffle bag and 80-100 lbs and the soviets had a similar device Clips of teams exercising with SADM can be seen at Having actually seen a SADM (minus a real core, of course), I can tell you it is not a "suitcase" device, unless you haul around one hell of a suitcase. It is closer in size to a garbage can (like the large kitchen variety). It pressed the ability of being a manportable device (the guy lugging it on his back could not carry much else in the way of mission equipment). As the Nuclear Weapons Archive describes it: "It was a cylinder 40 cm by 60 cm, and weighed 68 kg (the actual warhead portion weighed only 27 kg). Although the Mk-54 SADM has itself been called a "suitcase bomb" it is more like a "steamer trunk" bomb, especially considering its weight." http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...ssia/suitcase/ Alexander Lebed, ex Soviet General reported that a significant number of Soviet nuclear demolition charges were unaccounted for IRC. Lebed's rants have been amply discounted. "Gen. Lebed has told a variety of stories; first, that 100 were perhaps missing. Later, he said that perhaps none were missing. Later, he seemed to be confused about the difference between atomic demolition munitions and artillery shells. And now he claims that perhaps, even if they're missing, they don't pose a threat." (www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/military/ jan-june98/nukes_3-19.html ) The "Sixty Minutes" TV report that broke his story was later revealed to have been produced by a lady who, with her husband, had a book being published about the alleged threat of small nukes and who was involved in the production of a movie with a similar plotline. The Nuclear Weapons Archive has an interesting treatment of the Lebed claims that casts further doubt as to the specific veracity of his claims. Lastly, if they *had* developed weapons that small, and if they *were* unaccounted for, we'd likely have seen their use somewhere in the world by now, or at least heard more substantive information since then. Brooks Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Warszaw Pact War Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War ...) | Keith Willshaw | Military Aviation | 2 | December 10th 03 08:05 AM |
Warszaw Pact War Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War ...) | Matt Wiser | Military Aviation | 0 | December 7th 03 08:20 PM |
please stop bashing France | Grantland | Military Aviation | 233 | October 29th 03 01:23 AM |
What about the AIM-54 Pheonix Missile? | Flub | Military Aviation | 26 | October 5th 03 05:34 AM |
Laser simulator provides weapons training | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 28th 03 09:58 PM |