![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() B : positions, and fewer still in the media, know anybody in the enlisted : ranks. It's also an easily supportable case, since all enlistees sign : a contract that provides the government with the option of extending : enlistment indefinitely. Objections from soldiers or airmen whose : retirements are delayed can easily (and to some degree, accurately) : be dismissed as the timeless griping of the enlisted. (Stop-loss also : applies to officers.) The idea that such treatment has so far created Of course, there is an even greater danger that lurks in the very important 'contract' that military members sign. The US government can, at any time and without prior notification, alter pay and benefits to include eliminating them. The current military paradigm is centered on the idea that the *worst* possible things is temporary pause in the increase of benefits. If, however, the US runs short of money -- particularly in the context of a weak economy that may bring more potential recruits -- there might be a need/want to *reduce* military compensation levels. The 'all volunteer' military means different things to different people. To many, it means a military that operates on "market principles" that include wages and benefits sometime going down in accord with supply and demand, not always up. Others, however, take a more "union" approach that military members "deserve" a certain level of pay and benefits, and that market principles should not be applied. One of the key ongoing struggles wrt the Navy is the 'deployment pay' issue/fiasco. Congress passed the law, and the people stuck on long deployments sure as heck want the money, but the executive branch doesn't want to spend the money and the program is still not implemented (maybe in a few years, say those resisting). This is a case over disagreement on the raising of compensation -- you could imagine the screams if the government ever tried to lower levels of compensation. As unlikely as such a track might seem, it is something to seriously think about. regards, ---------------------------------------------------------------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Europe squadrons honored for high retention rates | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 10th 04 08:14 PM |
Hei polish moron also britain is going to breach eu deficit 3% rule | AIA | Military Aviation | 0 | October 24th 03 11:06 PM |