![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 29, 11:22*am, "noel.wade" wrote:
The big catch with those cheapie units you guys are posting links to is their low screen resolution. *Only ~270 or ~240 lines of pixels? *:- P All the IPAQ 3600/3800/3900 most of us have been flying with for years have the same screen res. 470/240 is not a problem in fact it makes the screen refreshes faster than units with higher res. but same speed processors. (they also have small battery capacities from what I can tell) Thats why you wire them into the ships power like a regular IPAQ solution. Since none of these "roll your own" systems are going to be IGC-legal for badges/records, why not simply use an IGC-legal external computer/ logger with its own GPS (a la the ewMicroRecorder or similar)? Most flights flown can use the software generated IGC files to post to OLC which is what 99% of flights are. If you want to get badges or records then you will have a full IGC logger in your possession anyway Ditching the GPS component from the PDA/PNA means a simpler device with a much lower power consumption level. *Seems to me that there are a lot of non-graphical (but IGC-legal) loggers and flight computers out there, and most work fine. *Its the moving-map/navigation aspect that needs work - so why not concentrate on that? The integrated GPS uses a lot less current than an separate device. Have you even seen the latest versions of XCSOAR? And If your GPS fails, you _do_ have charts in your plane... don't you?? Charts LOL of course and they are all up to date as well. Regards Al |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|