![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Garry O wrote:
"Garry O" wrote in message u... "Tim Wescott" wrote in message ... frank wrote: On Mar 10, 9:02 pm, Rufus wrote: durabol wrote: The two main methods for homebuilt construction would be casting vs. machining or some combination of both (probably the best option). Forging probably isn't appropriate for home construction (either the -- snip -- like a motorcycle engine - strip it down and just build the parts and accessories required to make it turn a prop. And along the way one can also machine it's component parts down to lighten it...run it on the ground, if it breaks, you know you went too far. -- - Rufus (pilot, engineer, jeweler, model builder...yadda, yadda...) Anything that flies a person has to be certified by the FAA anyway. Especially homebuilts due to some fatal crashes early on. The FAA licensing process for homebuilts is much lighter weight than for 'regular' aircraft. People can and do convert automotive engines for homebuilts, and fly them. There are many building processes that aren't certified for general aviation, but which are acceptable to the FAA inspectors for homebuilts. Check the EAA website (eaa.org?) -- they'll have something. www.faa.gov the eaa is a pilot organisation, not a controling authotiry :-) -- Tim Wescott Control system and signal processing consulting www.wescottdesign.com and I must remember to read what is written after the first coffee of the day 'DOH your correct, the EAA will have a lot of information on homebuilt and experimental A/C, they will also want you to get regular inspections during the construction, even on experimental I think, and at various benchmarks during the build. personally I wouldn't fly with any home made engine, and by home made I'm talking about things like casting your own cylinders etc, why re-invent the wheel when there is a plethora of R&D'd engines that can more easily and cheaply be converted. My feeling was that while the FAA will give you enough rules to make a swamp, the EAA will give you a map of the swamp so you can get through it! -- Tim Wescott Control system and signal processing consulting www.wescottdesign.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DIY Two-Stroke Engine | durabol[_2_] | Home Built | 55 | April 5th 10 05:11 PM |
Methods for altitude changes | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 141 | April 18th 07 12:48 AM |
Small 4 stroke engine? | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 35 | July 2nd 05 07:25 PM |
BSFC vs gas mileage, 2 stroke vs 4 stroke | Jay | Home Built | 10 | August 24th 04 02:26 PM |
engine construction blueprints | Håken | Military Aviation | 0 | April 27th 04 05:23 PM |