![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the latest DG newsletter:
http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/newsletter-138.html As I read Dirks' comments, Weber is full of crap. I also think Weber shot himself in the foot by publishing Dirks' comments. As laid out by Dirks, the rules say "the latest version" of the manual has to be used. He DOES NOT say that EASA requires it to be updated ever, much less every year. Only that it be updated "if necessary," but if changes are made, then those manuals have to be made available and used. The manuals need not be forced on people. Dirks says, " Under 21.A.57 it states that the TC holder shall update all manuals if necessary. Under 21.A.61 (b) it is stated that the TC must make the changes to the instructions of continued airworthiness (maintenance manuals) available to all known operators etc.." [emphasis mine] Even when Dirks says, " Under M.A.401 a) it states that for all maintenance only applicable current maintenance data (manuals) can be used. In addition under M.A.401(c) it states that the person or organisation maintaining an aircraft shall ensure that the applicable maintenance data is current." [emphasis mine] Dirks does not say that EASA says manuals have to updated every year. As I read what Dirks says about MA.401 a), a 30 year manual can be as considered current provided no safety issues or egregious errors have come up in the mean time. A 30 year old manual with a minor typo that does not effect safety is not an egregious error and EASA does not require the manual to be changed. Soooooooooo, when Weber says: "There is the necessity always to have the valid manuals available." He is correct. And when he says: "This necessity does not need an A/D (Airworthiness Directive), but it is defined in the rules of 'Part M'." He is correct. And when he says: "And there it is expressed absolutely clear." Guess what! He is correct! It is just that Weber's actions are not what is "expressed absolutely clear." As I read it, if anything is "expressed absolutely clear" in Dirks' comments, it is that EASA is not requiring ANY changes to the manuals. So Friedel, put THAT in your pipe and smoke it! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DG's new requirements for older DG ships | Victor Newman | Soaring | 2 | March 1st 10 08:10 PM |
DG's new requirements for older DG ships | Bernie[_3_] | Soaring | 11 | February 26th 10 05:27 PM |
DG's new requirements for older DG ships | jcarlyle | Soaring | 0 | February 21st 10 10:35 PM |
Latest trip | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 26th 07 12:23 PM |
Latest update | DHeitm8612 | General Aviation | 0 | August 1st 03 02:54 AM |