If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Flarm in the US
On Aug 11, 11:55*am, Westbender wrote:
On Aug 11, 10:41*am, Dave Nadler wrote: On Aug 11, 11:27*am, Westbender wrote: On Aug 11, 10:09*am, mattm wrote: On Aug 11, 10:41*am, Westbender wrote: Forgive me if this is a really dumb question. I don't know much about transponder operation. Is it a technical requirement for a transponder to only transmit when it's been interrogated by a ping from a remote source? I'm just wondering why transponders can't have a "timeout" mechanism built into it where it will automatically report/transmit if it hasn't been pinged in a certain amount of time. Something like a 30 second timeout? Maybe user-selectable? For the folks who fly in remote areas, wouldn't something like this help? Or is the transponder response of no use without pairing it with a request (ping)? That's the meaning of "transponder" -- it transmits a response (to a radar paint), plus it includes additional information. *It goes back to WWII days when it was originally known as IFF -- Identify Friend or Foe. *The detection methods based on transponder response depend on the timing between when the primary pulse is seen and the response. The larger the duration, the further from the transponder you are. This is the point of the FLARM scheme -- all the units periodically broadcast their status, so they are visible even when there is no radar around. -- Matt When I read the "how it works" on the Zaon website, it says it reads the response. It doesn't say anything about using the primary pulse in it's process. Is that typical of PCAS systems? This is where my question originates. It seems that the PCAS system might not need the initial request from a radar to evaluate threats. If so, then wouldn't an aircraft transponder "replying" without a radar pulse give surrounding aircraft with PCAS the means to detect? A PCAS system replies on someone else interrogating the transponders. "Someone" is either a ground radar station or a TCAS-II equipped aircraft. If you are in a valley without radar and without overflying jets, you will hear nothing. Hope that helps, Best Regards, Dave- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Right, did you read my first post? Since the MRX PCAS (passive) only uses the reply from transponders, wouldn't it be nice if the trig had a timed/scheduled transmit when not interrogated for a certain amount of time? If so, a combination of a trig/PCAS would be relatively inexpensive for glider-to-glider detection (yeah, yeah, assuming everyone had that combo). The best part would be the benefits of the "normal" operating mode of the trig and PCAS in relation to other GA and commercial aircraft. What are the ramifications of doing something such a thing? You CANNOT do that. You will never get approval for transmissions on 1090... Hope that's clear, Best Regards, Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IGC FLARM DLL | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | March 25th 08 11:27 AM |
WinPilot ADV & PRO 9.0b Flarm | Richard[_1_] | Soaring | 15 | February 6th 08 09:49 PM |
FLARM | Robert Hart | Soaring | 50 | March 16th 06 11:20 PM |
Flarm | Mal | Soaring | 4 | October 19th 05 08:44 AM |
FLARM | John Galloway | Soaring | 9 | November 27th 04 07:16 AM |